Suppr超能文献

[用于胆绞痛的抗炎药物:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析]

[Anti-inflammatory drugs for biliary colics: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials].

作者信息

Basurto Oña Xavier, Robles Perea Laura

机构信息

Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital de Figueres, Fundació Salut Empordà. Figueres, Girona, España.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Jan;31(1):1-7. doi: 10.1157/13114562.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In adults presenting to the emergency department with biliary colic, is treatment with non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) safer and more effective than treatment with other analgesics? The aim of this study was to answer this clinical question by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT).

METHODS

A systematic search for RCT was performed in Medline, Central, ClinicalTrials.gov, Lilacs, Teseo, and IME. A manual search was carried out in the references of retrieved articles and through contact with the authors of the RCT. All RCT comparing NSAIDs with any other active intervention in adults diagnosed with uncomplicated biliary colic were included. Outcome measures consisted of rescue analgesia, the rapidity of analgesic effect, progression to acute cholecystitis, and adverse effects. The RevMan program was used with a fixed effects model. The results were expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was analyzed with the chi-squared test with a statistical significance level of p < or = 0.10.

RESULTS

Seven RCT were selected, with 349 patients. Comparison between NSAIDs and all the other analgesics showed a benefit in favor of NSAIDs with a lower need for rescue analgesia (OR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.61) and less progression to acute cholecystitis (OR = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.08-0.44).

CONCLUSION

NSAIDs are the analgesics of choice in uncomplicated biliary colic since these drugs are more effective than other analgesics and can improve prognosis, limiting progression of colic to acute cholecystitis.

摘要

引言

对于因胆绞痛就诊于急诊科的成年人,使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)治疗是否比使用其他镇痛药更安全、更有效?本研究的目的是通过对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析来回答这个临床问题。

方法

在Medline、Central、ClinicalTrials.gov、Lilacs、Teseo和IME中对RCT进行系统检索。在检索到的文章参考文献中并通过与RCT的作者联系进行手工检索。纳入所有比较NSAIDs与任何其他积极干预措施治疗诊断为单纯性胆绞痛成年人的RCT。结局指标包括解救镇痛、镇痛效果的快速性、进展为急性胆囊炎以及不良反应。使用RevMan程序和固定效应模型。结果以比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)表示。采用卡方检验分析异质性,统计学显著性水平为p≤0.10。

结果

选择了7项RCT,共349例患者。NSAIDs与所有其他镇痛药之间的比较显示,NSAIDs具有优势,解救镇痛需求较低(OR = 0.32;95% CI,0.16 - 0.61),进展为急性胆囊炎的情况较少(OR = 0.19;95% CI,0.08 - 0.44)。

结论

NSAIDs是单纯性胆绞痛的首选镇痛药,因为这些药物比其他镇痛药更有效,并且可以改善预后,限制绞痛进展为急性胆囊炎。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验