Rodby Roger A
Section of Nephrology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Semin Dial. 2008 Mar-Apr;21(2):145-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00405.x. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
Prolonged exposure to gadolinium-based contrast (GBC) appears to be the core pathophysiologic factor in the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). As the GBC is renally excreted, this condition is predominantly seen only following exposure in patients with severe reductions in renal function. Fortunately, GBC is easily hemodialyzed with 95% of an administered dose removed after two hemodialysis sessions. Peritoneal dialysis, on the other hand, is not an efficient means of GBC removal. This has led to recommendations to hemodialyze a high-risk patient immediately following GBC administration and to repeat the treatment the following day. Although this approach seems logical and is more aggressive than the usual thrice-weekly hemodialysis schedule that most patients were receiving when they developed this devastating condition, there are no data to support the supposition that this approach will reduce the risk of NSF. Therefore, although an aggressive hemodialysis strategy postexposure is not unreasonable, it is probably best at this point to try to avoid GBC administration altogether in these high-risk patients.
长期接触钆基造影剂(GBC)似乎是肾源性系统性纤维化(NSF)发生发展的核心病理生理因素。由于GBC经肾脏排泄,这种情况主要仅在肾功能严重减退的患者接触后出现。幸运的是,GBC很容易通过血液透析清除,两次血液透析后可清除95%的给药剂量。另一方面,腹膜透析不是清除GBC的有效方法。这导致了一些建议,即在给予GBC后立即对高危患者进行血液透析,并在第二天重复治疗。尽管这种方法似乎合乎逻辑,而且比大多数患者在患上这种毁灭性疾病时所接受的通常每周三次的血液透析时间表更为积极,但没有数据支持这种方法会降低NSF风险的假设。因此,尽管接触后积极的血液透析策略并非不合理,但目前最好尽量避免在这些高危患者中使用GBC。