Polomano Rosemary C, Rathmell James P, Krenzischek Dina A, Dunwoody Colleen J
University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6096, USA.
J Perianesth Nurs. 2008 Feb;23(1 Suppl):S43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2007.11.006.
New approaches to the management of acute perioperative pain have focused on ways to improve the risk/benefit profile of various analgesics, enhance the consistency of pain control, address interpatient differences in responses to pain and treatments, and avoid periods of ineffective pain relief (analgesic gaps). Although intravenous patient-controlled analgesia has been the "gold standard" for acute pain management, there are now more analgesic options and compelling data to support combinations of analgesics or multimodal therapy, timing of analgesic interventions, and the use of newer drug delivery systems. Maximizing pain control with preemptive analgesia and multimodal therapy, and the availability of transdermal fentanyl by iontophoresis and extended-release epidural morphine have expanded the armamentarium of effective options for perioperative pain control. This article explores emerging trends in acute pain therapy, and discusses their implications for improving patient care.
围手术期急性疼痛管理的新方法聚焦于改善各类镇痛药的风险/效益比、增强疼痛控制的一致性、应对患者对疼痛及治疗反应的个体差异,以及避免无效镇痛期(镇痛空白期)。尽管静脉自控镇痛一直是急性疼痛管理的“金标准”,但现在有了更多的镇痛选择以及令人信服的数据来支持镇痛药联合使用或多模式治疗、镇痛干预的时机选择以及新型给药系统的应用。通过超前镇痛和多模式治疗实现疼痛控制最大化,以及离子电渗透皮芬太尼和缓释硬膜外吗啡的应用,扩大了围手术期疼痛控制有效选择的范围。本文探讨了急性疼痛治疗的新趋势,并讨论了它们对改善患者护理的意义。