• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业接触限值:一项比较研究。

Occupational exposure limits: a comparative study.

作者信息

Schenk Linda, Hansson Sven Ove, Rudén Christina, Gilek Michael

机构信息

Södertörn University College, School of Life Sciences, 14189 Huddinge, Sweden.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Mar;50(2):261-70. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.12.004. Epub 2007 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.12.004
PMID:18226844
Abstract

Occupational exposure limits (OELs) are used as an important regulatory instrument to protect workers' health from adverse effects of chemical exposures. The OELs mirror the outcome of the risk assessment and risk management performed by the standard setting actor. In this study we compared the OELs established by 18 different organisations or national regulatory agencies. The OELs were compared with respect to: (1) what chemicals have been selected and (2) the average level of exposure limits for all chemicals. Our database contains OELs for a total of 1341 substances; of these 25 substances have OELs from all 18 organisations while more than one-third of the substances are only regulated by one organisation. The average level of the exposure limits has declined during the past 10 years for 6 of the 8 organisations in our study for which historical data were available; it has increased for Poland and remained nearly unchanged for Sweden. The average level of OELs differs substantially between organisations; the US OSHA exposure limits are (on average) nearly 40 % higher than those of Poland. The scientific or policy-related motivations for these differences remain to be analysed.

摘要

职业接触限值(OELs)是一种重要的监管手段,用于保护工人健康免受化学物质接触的不利影响。职业接触限值反映了标准制定机构进行的风险评估和风险管理的结果。在本研究中,我们比较了18个不同组织或国家监管机构制定的职业接触限值。比较职业接触限值时考虑了以下两个方面:(1)所选的化学物质;(2)所有化学物质的接触限值平均水平。我们的数据库包含总共1341种物质的职业接触限值;其中25种物质在所有18个组织中都有职业接触限值,而超过三分之一的物质仅由一个组织进行监管。在我们研究的8个有历史数据的组织中,有6个组织的接触限值平均水平在过去10年中有所下降;波兰的接触限值平均水平有所上升,瑞典的则几乎保持不变。不同组织之间职业接触限值的平均水平差异很大;美国职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)的接触限值(平均)比波兰的高出近40%。这些差异背后的科学或政策相关动机仍有待分析。

相似文献

1
Occupational exposure limits: a comparative study.职业接触限值:一项比较研究。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Mar;50(2):261-70. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.12.004. Epub 2007 Dec 23.
2
Are occupational exposure limits becoming more alike within the European Union?欧盟内部的职业接触限值是否正变得越来越相似?
J Appl Toxicol. 2008 Oct;28(7):858-66. doi: 10.1002/jat.1349.
3
Extensive changes to occupational exposure limits in Korea.韩国对职业接触限值进行了广泛修改。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Nov;58(2):345-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
4
[Comparative study on occupational exposure limits of chemical substances in workplace between GBZ 2.1 in China and ACGIH in USA].[中国GBZ 2.1与美国ACGIH工作场所化学物质职业接触限值的比较研究]
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2014 Jan;32(1):1-26.
5
Misinterpretation and misuse of exposure limits.暴露限值的误解与误用。
Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001 Feb;16(2):251-6. doi: 10.1080/10473220118280.
6
The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Taiwan.台湾职业暴露限值的制定与监管。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006 Nov;46(2):142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 May 15.
7
Approaches for the development of occupational exposure limits for man-made mineral fibres (MMMFs).制定人造矿物纤维(MMMFs)职业接触限值的方法。
Mutat Res. 2004 Sep 3;553(1-2):37-41. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.06.017.
8
The significance of neurobehavioral tests for occupational exposure limits: an example from Sweden.
Neurotoxicology. 2000 Oct;21(5):653-8.
9
Background, approaches and recent trends for setting health-based occupational exposure limits: a minireview.基于健康的职业接触限值设定的背景、方法及近期趋势:一篇综述
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Aug;51(3):253-69. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
10
A scoping survey of attitudes towards occupational exposure limits and REACH derived no effect levels for workers among chemical risk managers at Swedish workplaces.一项针对瑞典工作场所化学风险管理人员对职业接触限值和 REACH 衍生无效应水平的态度的范围调查。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020 Sep 17;33(5):611-620. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01493. Epub 2020 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Workplace Risk Factors Assessment in North-Azadegan Oil Field Based on Harmful Agents Risk Priority Index (HARPI).基于有害因素风险优先级指数(HARPI)的北阿扎德甘油田工作场所风险因素评估
Iran J Public Health. 2023 Oct;52(10):2157-2168. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i10.13854.
2
Occupational exposure to BTEX and styrene in West Asian countries: a brief review of current state and limits.西亚国家苯系物(BTEX)和苯乙烯职业暴露:当前状况和限值的简要综述。
Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2022 Jul 7;73(2):107-118. doi: 10.2478/aiht-2022-73-3634.
3
Hemoglobin adducts as an important marker of chronic exposure to low concentration of 1, 3-butadiene.
血红蛋白加合物作为长期低浓度接触1,3 - 丁二烯的重要标志物。
J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2021 Aug 9;19(2):1607-1611. doi: 10.1007/s40201-021-00716-8. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
Application of biological monitoring for exposure assessment of 1.3 Butadiene.生物监测在1,3 - 丁二烯暴露评估中的应用。
J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2020 Sep 28;18(2):1265-1269. doi: 10.1007/s40201-020-00544-2. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
What is useful research? The good, the bad, and the stable.什么是有用的研究?好的、坏的和稳定的。
Environ Health. 2020 Jan 7;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12940-019-0556-5.
6
Health risk assessment of VOC emissions in laboratory rooms via a modeling approach.通过建模方法评估实验室房间中 VOC 排放的健康风险。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(18):17890-17900. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1982-6. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
7
The Global Landscape of Occupational Exposure Limits--Implementation of Harmonization Principles to Guide Limit Selection.职业接触限值的全球格局——实施协调原则以指导限值选择
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12 Suppl 1(sup1):S127-44. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1060327.