DeWitte Sharon N, Wood James W
Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, Albany, NY 12222, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 5;105(5):1436-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705460105. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
Was the mortality associated with the deadliest known epidemic in human history, the Black Death of 1347-1351, selective with respect to preexisting health conditions ("frailty")? Many researchers have assumed that the Black Death was so virulent, and the European population so immunologically naïve, that the epidemic killed indiscriminately, irrespective of age, sex, or frailty. If this were true, Black Death cemeteries would provide unbiased cross-sections of demographic and epidemiological conditions in 14th-century Europe. Using skeletal remains from medieval England and Denmark, new methods of paleodemographic age estimation, and a recent multistate model of selective mortality, we test the assumption that the mid-14th-century Black Death killed indiscriminately. Skeletons from the East Smithfield Black Death cemetery in London are compared with normal, nonepidemic cemetery samples from two medieval Danish towns (Viborg and Odense). The results suggest that the Black Death did not kill indiscriminately-that it was, in fact, selective with respect to frailty, although probably not as strongly selective as normal mortality.
与人类历史上已知最致命的流行病——1347年至1351年的黑死病相关的死亡率,在先前存在的健康状况(“虚弱”)方面是否具有选择性?许多研究人员认为,黑死病毒性极强,而欧洲人口在免疫方面又毫无经验,以至于这场流行病不分青红皂白地杀人,无论年龄、性别或身体虚弱与否。如果真是这样,黑死病墓地就能提供14世纪欧洲人口统计学和流行病学状况的无偏差横截面。利用中世纪英格兰和丹麦的骨骼遗骸、古人口统计学年龄估计的新方法,以及最近的选择性死亡率多状态模型,我们检验了14世纪中叶黑死病不分青红皂白杀人的假设。将伦敦东史密斯菲尔德黑死病墓地的骨骼与来自两个中世纪丹麦城镇(维堡和欧登塞)的正常、非流行墓地样本进行比较。结果表明,黑死病并非不分青红皂白地杀人——事实上,它在虚弱方面具有选择性,尽管可能不像正常死亡率那样具有强烈的选择性。