Suppr超能文献

14世纪黑死病的时间动态:来自英国教会记录的新证据。

The temporal dynamics of the fourteenth-century Black Death: new evidence from English ecclesiastical records.

作者信息

Wood James W, Ferrell Rebecca J, Dewitte-Aviña Sharon N

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

出版信息

Hum Biol. 2003 Aug;75(4):427-48. doi: 10.1353/hub.2003.0067.

Abstract

Recent research has questioned whether the European Black Death of 1347-1351 could possibly have been caused by the bubonic plague bacillus Yersinia pestis, as has been assumed for over a century. Central to the arguments both for and against involvement of Y. pestis has been a comparison of the temporal dynamics observed in confirmed outbreaks of bubonic plague in early-20th-century India, versus those reconstructed for the Black Death from English church records--specifically, from lists of institutions (appointments) to vacated benefices contained in surviving bishops' registers. This comparison is, however, based on a statistical error arising from the fact that most of the bishops' registers give only the dates of institution and not the dates of death. Failure to correct for a distributed (as opposed to constant) lag time from death to institution has made it look as if the Black Death passed slowly through specific localities. This error is compounded by a failure to disaggregate the information from the bishops' registers to a geographical level that is genuinely comparable to the modern data. A sample of 235 deaths from the bishop's register of Coventry and Lichfield, the only English register to list both date of death and date of institution, shows that the Black Death swept through local areas much more rapidly than has previously been thought. This finding is consistent with those of earlier studies showing that the Black Death spread too rapidly between locales to have been a zoonosis such as bubonic plague. A further analysis of the determinants of the lag between death and institution, designed to provide a basis for reexamining other bishops' registers that do not provide information on date of death, shows that the distribution of lags could vary significantly by time and space even during a single epidemic outbreak.

摘要

最近的研究对1347年至1351年欧洲黑死病是否可能由鼠疫杆菌耶尔森氏鼠疫杆菌引起提出了质疑,一个多世纪以来人们一直是这样认为的。支持和反对耶尔森氏鼠疫杆菌参与其中的争论核心,是将20世纪初印度确诊的腺鼠疫疫情中观察到的时间动态,与根据英国教会记录(具体来说,是幸存的主教登记簿中列出的机构(任命)到空缺教职的清单)重建的黑死病时间动态进行比较。然而,这种比较基于一个统计错误,即大多数主教登记簿只给出了任职日期,而没有给出死亡日期。由于未能纠正从死亡到任职的分布(而非固定)滞后时间,使得黑死病看起来好像是缓慢地穿过特定地区。由于未能将主教登记簿中的信息分解到与现代数据真正可比的地理层面,这个错误更加严重。考文垂和利奇菲尔德主教登记簿中有235例死亡样本,这是英国唯一列出死亡日期和任职日期的登记簿,显示黑死病在当地传播的速度比之前认为的要快得多。这一发现与早期研究结果一致,即黑死病在不同地区之间传播太快,不可能是腺鼠疫这样的人畜共患病。对死亡和任职之间滞后时间的决定因素进行的进一步分析,旨在为重新审视其他未提供死亡日期信息的主教登记簿提供依据,结果表明,即使在一次单一的疫情爆发期间,滞后时间的分布也可能因时间和空间而有很大差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验