Suppr超能文献

用安卡拉改良痘苗病毒替代痘苗病毒伊斯特里株来测试化学消毒剂的杀病毒效力。

Substitution of vaccinia virus Elstree by modified vaccinia virus Ankara to test the virucidal efficacy of chemical disinfectants.

作者信息

Hartnack S, Essbauer S, Truyen U

机构信息

Institute for Animal Hygiene and Veterinary Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Zoonoses Public Health. 2008;55(2):99-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01094.x.

Abstract

After the eradication of variola in 1980, the smallpox vaccination was considered to be no longer required and was subsequently abandoned mainly because of possible adverse effects of vaccinia virus especially in first-time vaccinees. Despite a growing number of humans without immunity against vaccinia virus, vaccinia virus Lister Elstree (VACV) is still prescribed for testing virucidal efficacy of chemical disinfectants in the guidelines of the German Veterinary Medical Society [Deutsche Veterinärmedizinische Gesellschaft (DVG)], the German Association for the Control of Virus Diseases [Deutsche Vereinigung zur Bekämpfung der Viruskrankheiten (DVV)] and the Robert Koch Institute (RKI). To evaluate a possible substitution of VACV, with the attenuated modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) the virucidal efficacy of four different DVG-listed commercially available chemical disinfectants representing different groups of chemicals was tested against these two viruses. Quantitative suspension tests and qualitative carrier tests with poplar wood and gauze were performed. Distinction of VACV and MVA was confirmed by cytopathogenic effects, such as differences in plaque morphology. No significant difference in disinfection efficacy between VACV and MVA was observed for any of the disinfectants tested. Implying that vaccinia virus poses a risk after inadvertent inoculation, our results show that MVA, which does not replicate in humans, should replace VACV in the chemical disinfectant testing guidelines.

摘要

1980年天花被根除后,人们认为不再需要接种天花疫苗,随后该疫苗被弃用,主要原因是痘苗病毒可能产生的不良反应,尤其是在初次接种疫苗者中。尽管对痘苗病毒无免疫力的人越来越多,但德国兽医协会[Deutsche Veterinärmedizinische Gesellschaft (DVG)]、德国病毒病防治协会[Deutsche Vereinigung zur Bekämpfung der Viruskrankheiten (DVV)]和罗伯特·科赫研究所(RKI)的指南中仍规定使用痘苗病毒李斯特埃尔斯特里(VACV)来测试化学消毒剂的杀病毒效果。为了评估VACV的可能替代物,使用减毒的安卡拉痘苗病毒(MVA)对四种不同的、代表不同化学组的DVG列出的市售化学消毒剂针对这两种病毒的杀病毒效果进行了测试。进行了定量悬液试验以及用杨木和纱布进行的定性载体试验。通过细胞病变效应(如蚀斑形态差异)确认了VACV和MVA的区别。在所测试的任何消毒剂中,未观察到VACV和MVA在消毒效果上有显著差异。由于痘苗病毒在意外接种后会带来风险,我们的结果表明,在化学消毒剂测试指南中,不会在人体内复制的MVA应取代VACV。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验