Piek Jan P, Dawson Lisa, Smith Leigh M, Gasson Natalie
School of Psychology, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Western Australia, Australia.
Hum Mov Sci. 2008 Oct;27(5):668-81. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.11.002. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
The aim of this study was to determine whether information obtained from measures of motor performance taken from birth to 4 years of age predicted motor and cognitive performance of children once they reached school age. Participants included 33 children aged from 6 years to 11 years and 6 months who had been assessed at ages 4 months to 4 years using the ages and stages questionnaires (ASQ: [Squires, J. K., Potter, L., & Bricker, D. (1995). The ages and stages questionnaire users guide. Baltimore: Brookes]). These scores were used to obtain trajectory information consisting of the age of asymptote, maximum or minimum score, and the variance of ASQ scores. At school age, both motor and cognitive ability were assessed using the McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development (MAND: [McCarron, L. (1997). McCarron assessment of neuromuscular development: Fine and gross motor abilities (revised ed.). Dallas, TX: Common Market Press.]), and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Version IV (WISC-IV: [Wechsler, D. (2004). WISC-IV integrated technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, Texas: Harcourt Assessment]). In contrast to previous research, results demonstrated that, although socio-economic status (SES) predicted fine motor performance and three of four cognitive domains at school age, gestational age was not a significant predictor of later development. This may have been due to the low-risk nature of the sample. After controlling for SES, fine motor trajectory information did not account for a significant proportion of the variance in school aged fine motor performance or cognitive performance. The ASQ gross motor trajectory set of predictors accounted for a significant proportion of the variance for cognitive performance once SES was controlled for. Further analysis showed a significant predictive relationship for gross motor trajectory information and the subtests of working memory and processing speed. These results provide evidence for detecting children at risk of developmental delays or disorders with a parent report questionnaire prior to school age. The findings also add to recent investigations into the relationship between early motor development and later cognitive function, and support the need for ongoing research into a potential etiological relationship.
本研究的目的是确定从出生到4岁期间获得的运动表现测量信息,能否预测儿童达到学龄后的运动和认知表现。研究参与者包括33名年龄在6岁至11岁6个月之间的儿童,他们在4个月至4岁时使用年龄与发育阶段问卷(ASQ:[斯奎尔斯,J.K.,波特,L.,& 布里克,D.(1995年)。《年龄与发育阶段问卷用户指南》。巴尔的摩:布鲁克斯出版社])进行了评估。这些分数用于获取轨迹信息,包括渐近线年龄、最高或最低分数以及ASQ分数的方差。在学龄期,使用麦卡伦神经肌肉发育评估量表(MAND:[麦卡伦,L.(1997年)。《麦卡伦神经肌肉发育评估:精细和粗大运动能力》(修订版)。得克萨斯州达拉斯:共同市场出版社])以及韦氏儿童智力量表第四版(WISC-IV:[韦克斯勒,D.(2004年)。《WISC-IV综合技术与解释手册》。得克萨斯州圣安东尼奥:哈考特评估公司])对运动和认知能力进行评估。与先前的研究不同,结果表明,尽管社会经济地位(SES)可预测学龄期的精细运动表现以及四个认知领域中的三个,但胎龄并非后期发育的显著预测因素。这可能是由于样本的低风险性质所致。在控制了SES之后,精细运动轨迹信息在学龄期精细运动表现或认知表现的方差中所占比例并不显著。一旦控制了SES因素,ASQ粗大运动轨迹预测指标集在认知表现的方差中占显著比例。进一步分析表明,粗大运动轨迹信息与工作记忆和处理速度子测试之间存在显著的预测关系。这些结果为在学龄前期通过家长报告问卷检测有发育迟缓或障碍风险的儿童提供了证据。这些发现还为近期关于早期运动发育与后期认知功能之间关系的研究增添了内容,并支持对潜在病因关系进行持续研究的必要性。