• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最简单的选择反应时间完整模型:线性弹道积累。

The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.

作者信息

Brown Scott D, Heathcote Andrew

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2008 Nov;57(3):153-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002
PMID:18243170
Abstract

We propose a linear ballistic accumulator (LBA) model of decision making and reaction time. The LBA is simpler than other models of choice response time, with independent accumulators that race towards a common response threshold. Activity in the accumulators increases in a linear and deterministic manner. The simplicity of the model allows complete analytic solutions for choices between any number of alternatives. These solutions (and freely-available computer code) make the model easy to apply to both binary and multiple choice situations. Using data from five previously published experiments, we demonstrate that the LBA model successfully accommodates empirical phenomena from binary and multiple choice tasks that have proven difficult for other theoretical accounts. Our results are encouraging in a field beset by the tradeoff between complexity and completeness.

摘要

我们提出了一种决策和反应时间的线性弹道累加器(LBA)模型。LBA比其他选择反应时间模型更简单,具有独立的累加器,它们朝着共同的反应阈值竞争。累加器中的活动以线性和确定性的方式增加。该模型的简单性允许对任意数量的备选方案之间的选择进行完整的解析解。这些解(以及免费提供的计算机代码)使该模型易于应用于二元和多项选择情况。利用之前发表的五个实验的数据,我们证明LBA模型成功地解释了二元和多项选择任务中的经验现象,而这些现象已被证明对其他理论解释来说是困难的。在一个受复杂性和完整性之间权衡困扰的领域,我们的结果令人鼓舞。

相似文献

1
The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.最简单的选择反应时间完整模型:线性弹道积累。
Cogn Psychol. 2008 Nov;57(3):153-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
2
Getting more from accuracy and response time data: methods for fitting the linear ballistic accumulator.从准确性和响应时间数据中获取更多信息:线性弹道累积器的拟合方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1095-110. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1095.
3
Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models for response time with different conclusions about psychological mechanisms?扩散模型与线性弹道积累模型:反应时间的不同模型对心理机制有不同结论?
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Jun;66(2):125-36. doi: 10.1037/a0028189.
4
A ballistic model of choice response time.选择反应时间的弹道模型。
Psychol Rev. 2005 Jan;112(1):117-28. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.117.
5
An integrated model of choices and response times in absolute identification.绝对识别中选择与反应时间的综合模型。
Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;115(2):396-425. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.396.
6
Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time.选择反应时主要建模方案的不可证伪性和互译性。
Psychol Rev. 2014 Jan;121(1):1-32. doi: 10.1037/a0034190. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
7
Tradeoffs and theory: the double-mediation model.权衡与理论:双中介模型
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 May;135(2):237-61. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.237.
8
Integrating cognitive process and descriptive models of attitudes and preferences.整合认知过程以及态度和偏好的描述模型。
Cogn Sci. 2014 May-Jun;38(4):701-35. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12094. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
9
Accumulating advantages: A new conceptualization of rapid multiple choice.累积优势:一种新的快速多项选择概念化。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;127(2):186-215. doi: 10.1037/rev0000166. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
10
The unexpected empirical consensus among consensus methods.共识方法之间意外的经验性共识。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):629-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01950.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Second-order facial features are processed analytically in composite faces.二阶面部特征在合成面孔中进行分析处理。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03144-0.
2
Probing for intentions: The early readiness potential does not reflect awareness of motor preparation.探寻意图:早期准备电位并不反映运动准备意识。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Feb 7;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00465. eCollection 2025.
3
Regressing away common neural choice signals does not make them artifacts: Comment on Frömer et al. 2024.
剔除共同的神经选择信号并不会使其成为伪迹:对弗勒默等人2024年研究的评论
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Jun 24;3. doi: 10.1162/IMAG.a.60. eCollection 2025.
4
Data From a Validation Study of Two Psychometric Models on Test-taking Behavior.来自两项关于考试行为的心理测量模型验证研究的数据。
J Open Psychol Data. 2025 Mar 21;13:1. doi: 10.5334/jopd.124. eCollection 2025.
5
The limits of metacognitive control during perceptual decision-making: opting out without improving accuracy.知觉决策过程中元认知控制的局限性:在不提高准确性的情况下选择退出。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 20;16:1551665. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1551665. eCollection 2025.
6
Elongated tau in an ex-Gaussian decomposition of vocal articulation speed in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童语音清晰度速度的前高斯分解中的延长τ值。
Neuropsychology. 2025 Sep;39(6):548-560. doi: 10.1037/neu0001015. Epub 2025 May 8.
7
Adult age differences in the integration of values for self and other.成人在自我与他人价值观整合方面的年龄差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 14;15(1):12776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96656-6.
8
Time and memory costs jointly determine a speed-accuracy trade-off and set-size effects.时间和记忆成本共同决定了速度-准确性权衡和集合大小效应。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Jun;154(6):1611-1627. doi: 10.1037/xge0001760. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
9
Disentangling sources of variability in decision-making.理清决策中变异性的来源。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2025 May;26(5):247-262. doi: 10.1038/s41583-025-00916-3. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
10
Relative social status alters the synchrony of attribute integration in altruistic decisions.相对社会地位会改变利他决策中属性整合的同步性。
iScience. 2025 Jan 27;28(3):111911. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111911. eCollection 2025 Mar 21.