Wright Michael, Wood Justin, Lynch Thomas, Clark David
International Observatory on End of Life Care, Institute for Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008 May;35(5):469-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.06.006. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
Palliative care is coming to be regarded as a human right. Yet globally, palliative care development appears patchy and comparative data about the distribution of services are generally unavailable. Our purpose is to categorize hospice-palliative care development, country by country, throughout the world, and then depict this development in a series of world and regional maps. We adopt a multimethod approach, which involves the synthesis of evidence from published and grey literature, regional experts, and a task force of the European Association of Palliative Care. Development is categorized using a four-part typology constructed during a previous review of palliative care in Africa. The four categories are (1) no identified hospice-palliative care activity, (2) capacity building activity but no service, (3) localized palliative care provision, and (4) countries where palliative care activities are approaching integration with mainstream service providers. We found palliative care services in 115/234 countries. Total countries in each category are as follows: (1) no identified activity 78 (33%), (2) capacity building 41 (18%), (3) localized provision 80 (34%), and (4) approaching integration 35 (15%). The ratio of services to population among Group 4 countries ranges from 1:43,000 (in the UK) to 1:4.28 million (in Kenya); among Group 3 countries it ranges from 1:14,000 (in Gibraltar) to 1:158 million (in Pakistan). The typology differentiates levels of palliative care development across the four hemispheres and in rich and poor settings. Although half of the world's countries have a palliative care service, far more are needed before such services are generally accessible worldwide.
姑息治疗正逐渐被视为一项人权。然而在全球范围内,姑息治疗的发展似乎并不均衡,关于服务分布的比较数据通常难以获取。我们的目的是逐个国家地对全球临终关怀 - 姑息治疗的发展进行分类,然后在一系列世界地图和区域地图上描绘这种发展情况。我们采用了一种多方法途径,其中包括综合已发表文献、灰色文献、区域专家以及欧洲姑息治疗协会特别工作组提供的证据。利用在之前对非洲姑息治疗的审查中构建的四分类型法对发展情况进行分类。这四个类别分别是:(1)未发现临终关怀 - 姑息治疗活动;(2)有能力建设活动但无服务;(3)局部提供姑息治疗;(4)姑息治疗活动正接近与主流服务提供者整合的国家。我们在234个国家中的115个国家发现了姑息治疗服务。每个类别的国家总数如下:(1)未发现活动的国家78个(33%),(2)有能力建设的国家41个(18%),(3)局部提供服务的国家80个(34%),(4)接近整合的国家35个(15%)。第4组国家中服务与人口的比例从1:43000(在英国)到1:428万(在肯尼亚)不等;第3组国家中该比例从1:14000(在直布罗陀)到1:1.58亿(在巴基斯坦)不等。这种类型法区分了四个半球以及贫富地区姑息治疗的发展水平。尽管世界上一半的国家拥有姑息治疗服务,但在全球普遍可及之前,仍需要更多的此类服务。