Elder N C, Brungs S M, Nagy M, Kudel I, Render M L
Department of Family Medicine, University of Cincinnati, PO Box 670589, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Feb;17(1):25-30. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.021949.
It is unknown if successful changes in specific safety practices in the intensive care unit (ICU) generalize to broader concepts of patient safety by staff nurses.
To explore perceptions of patient safety among nursing staff in ICUs following participation in a safety project that decreased hospital acquired infections.
After implementation of practices that reduced catheter-related bloodstream infections in ICUs at four community hospitals, ICU nurses participated in focus groups to discuss patient safety. Audiotapes from the focus groups were transcribed, and two independent reviewers categorised the data which were triangulated with responses from selected questions of safety climate surveys and with the safety checklists used by management leadership on walk rounds.
Thirty-three nurses attended eight focus groups; 92 nurses and managers completed safety climate surveys, and three separate leadership checklists were reviewed. In focus groups, nurses predominantly related patient safety to dangers in the physical environment (eg, bed rails, alarms, restraints, equipment, etc.) and to medication administration. These areas also represented 47% of checklist items from leadership walk rounds. Nurses most frequently mentioned self-initiated "double checking" as their main safety task. Focus-group participants and survey responses both noted inconsistency between management's verbal and written commitment compared with their day-to-day support of patient safety issues.
ICU nurses who participated in a project to decrease hospital acquired infections did not generalize their experience to other aspects of patient safety or relate it to management's interest in patient safety. These findings are consistent with many adult learning theories, where self-initiated tasks, combined with immediate, but temporary problem-solving, are stronger learning forces than management-led activities with delayed feedback.
重症监护病房(ICU)中特定安全措施的成功改变是否能推广至护士对更广泛患者安全概念的认知尚不清楚。
探讨参与一项降低医院获得性感染的安全项目后,ICU护士对患者安全的认知。
在四家社区医院实施降低ICU导管相关血流感染的措施后,ICU护士参加焦点小组讨论患者安全问题。对焦点小组的录音进行转录,两名独立审阅者对数据进行分类,并与安全氛围调查中选定问题的回答以及管理层领导在巡查时使用的安全检查表进行三角验证。
33名护士参加了8个焦点小组;92名护士和管理人员完成了安全氛围调查,并审查了三份独立的领导检查表。在焦点小组中,护士主要将患者安全与物理环境中的危险(如床栏、警报器、约束带、设备等)以及药物管理联系起来。这些领域也占领导巡查检查表项目的47%。护士最常提到自我发起的“双人核对”是他们主要的安全任务。焦点小组参与者和调查回复都指出,与管理层对患者安全问题的日常支持相比,其口头和书面承诺存在不一致。
参与降低医院获得性感染项目的ICU护士并未将其经验推广至患者安全的其他方面,也未将其与管理层对患者安全的关注联系起来。这些发现与许多成人学习理论一致,即自我发起的任务,结合即时但临时的问题解决,比管理层主导且反馈延迟的活动具有更强的学习驱动力。