van Leeuwen Stefan P J, de Boer Jacob
VU University - Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008 Feb;52(2):194-203. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200700207.
In order to determine the contamination with brominated flame retardants (BFR) in fish regularly consumed by Dutch citizens, 44 samples of freshwater fish, marine fish, and shellfish were analyzed for polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE), tetrabromobisphenol-A (TBBP-A) and its methylated derivative (me-TBBP-A), and hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD), including its alpha-, beta- and gamma-diastereomers. The highest BFR concentrations were found in pike-perch and eel from the highly industrialized and urbanized rivers Rhine and Meuse. The sum concentrations of BDE 28, 47, 99, 100, 153, 154, 183, 209, and brominated biphenyl (BB) 153 and HBCD (selection based on The European Food Safety Authority monitoring recommendation) ranged from below quantification limits to 17 ng/g wet weight (ww) in marine fish and in freshwater fish from 0.6 ng/g ww in pike-perch to 380 ng/g ww in eel. The BDE congener profile in all fish and shellfish samples is dominated by BDE 47, followed by BDE 99, except for eel in which BDE 100 is higher than BDE 99. BDE 209 was detected in two mussel samples, most likely due to BDE 209 contaminated particulate matter in their intestines. Total-HBCD (as determined by GC/electron capture negative ion (ECNI)-MS) was detected in 22 out of the 44 samples in concentrations between 0.20 ng/g in marine fish and 230 ng/g ww in eel. Three HBCD diastereomers were determined by HPLC/ESI-MS/MS. alpha-HBCD was the prevalent congener in most fish samples, followed by gamma-HBCD. beta-HBCD, TBBP-A and me-TBBP-A were only detected in a few samples and at low concentrations. A considerable difference was found between HBCD results obtained from GC/ECNI-MS and HPLC/ESI-MS/MS: the GC/ECNI-MS results were 4.4 times higher, according to regression analysis. There is hardly any data on human dietary exposure to HBCD available. We have estimated the fish-related dietary exposure of HBCD for the average Dutch population. The medium bound intake was estimated at 8.3 ng/day for a 70-kg person (0.12 ng/kg bodyweight/day). For this estimation, we relied mostly on HPLC/ESI-MS/MS data as we argue that these results are more accurate than those obtained by GC/ECNI-MS.
为了确定荷兰居民经常食用的鱼类中溴化阻燃剂(BFR)的污染情况,对44份淡水鱼、海鱼和贝类样本进行了分析,检测其中的多溴二苯醚(PBDE)、四溴双酚A(TBBP-A)及其甲基化衍生物(甲基化TBBP-A)和六溴环十二烷(HBCD),包括其α-、β-和γ-非对映异构体。在莱茵河和默兹河高度工业化和城市化河段的梭鲈和鳗鱼中发现了最高的BFR浓度。根据欧洲食品安全局的监测建议选取的BDE 28、47、99、100、153、154、183、209以及溴化联苯(BB)153和HBCD的总浓度,在海鱼中范围为低于定量限至17纳克/克湿重(ww),在淡水鱼中,梭鲈为0.6纳克/克湿重,鳗鱼中为380纳克/克湿重。所有鱼类和贝类样本中的BDE同系物分布以BDE 47为主,其次是BDE 99,但鳗鱼中BDE 100高于BDE 99。在两个贻贝样本中检测到了BDE 209,很可能是由于其肠道中存在受BDE 209污染的颗粒物。44个样本中有22个检测到了总HBCD(通过气相色谱/电子捕获负离子(ECNI)-质谱法测定),浓度范围在海鱼中为0.20纳克/克,鳗鱼中为230纳克/克湿重。通过高效液相色谱/电喷雾电离质谱/质谱法测定了三种HBCD非对映异构体。α-HBCD是大多数鱼类样本中的主要同系物,其次是γ-HBCD。β-HBCD、TBBP-A和甲基化TBBP-A仅在少数样本中以低浓度被检测到。发现气相色谱/电子捕获负离子质谱法和高效液相色谱/电喷雾电离质谱/质谱法得到的HBCD结果存在显著差异:根据回归分析,气相色谱/电子捕获负离子质谱法的结果高出4.4倍。几乎没有关于人类饮食中HBCD暴露的可用数据。我们估算了荷兰普通人群通过鱼类摄入HBCD的饮食暴露量。对于一个70千克的人,估算的中等摄入量为每天8.3纳克(0.12纳克/千克体重/天)。在进行此估算时,我们主要依据高效液相色谱/电喷雾电离质谱/质谱法的数据,因为我们认为这些结果比气相色谱/电子捕获负离子质谱法得到的结果更准确。