Kloos Heidi, Sloutsky Vladimir M
Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, OH, USA.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Feb;137(1):52-72. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.52.
This research examined how differences in category structure affect category learning and category representation across points of development. The authors specifically focused on category density--or the proportion of category-relevant variance to the total variance. Results of Experiments 1-3 showed a clear dissociation between dense and sparse categories: Whereas dense categories were readily learned without supervision, learning of sparse categories required supervision. There were also developmental differences in how statistical density affected category representation. Although children represented both dense and sparse categories on the basis of the overall similarity (Experiment 4A), adults represented dense categories on the basis of similarity and represented sparse categories on the basis of the inclusion rule (Experiment 4B). The results support the notion that statistical structure interacts with the learning regime in their effects on category learning. In addition, these results elucidate important developmental differences in how categories are represented, which presents interesting challenges for theories of categorization.
本研究考察了类别结构的差异如何影响不同发展阶段的类别学习和类别表征。作者特别关注类别密度,即与类别相关的方差占总方差的比例。实验1 - 3的结果表明,密集类别和稀疏类别之间存在明显的分离:密集类别在无监督的情况下很容易被学习,而稀疏类别的学习需要监督。统计密度对类别表征的影响也存在发展差异。尽管儿童基于整体相似性来表征密集类别和稀疏类别(实验4A),但成年人基于相似性来表征密集类别,基于包含规则来表征稀疏类别(实验4B)。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即统计结构在对类别学习的影响中与学习方式相互作用。此外,这些结果阐明了在类别表征方式上重要的发展差异,这给分类理论带来了有趣的挑战。