• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用概率阈模型揭示分类中的对比类别。

Uncovering contrast categories in categorization with a probabilistic threshold model.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, Box 3721, BE-3000 Leuven.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Nov;37(6):1515-31. doi: 10.1037/a0024431. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

DOI:10.1037/a0024431
PMID:21767056
Abstract

A contrast category effect on categorization occurs when the decision to apply a category term to an entity not only involves a comparison between the entity and the target category but is also influenced by a comparison of the entity with 1 or more alternative categories from the same domain as the target. Establishing a contrast category effect on categorization in natural language categories has proven to be laborious, especially when the categories concerned are natural kinds situated at the superordinate level of abstraction. We conducted 3 studies with these categories to look for an influence on categorization of both similarity to the target category and similarity to a contrast category. The results are analyzed with a probabilistic threshold model that assumes categorization decisions arise from the placement of threshold criteria by individual categorizers along a single scale that holds the experimental stimuli. The stimuli's positions along the scale are shown to be influenced by similarity to both target and contrast. These findings suggest that the prevalence of contrast category effects on categorization might have been underestimated. Additional analyses demonstrate how the proposed model can be employed in future studies to systematically investigate the origins of contrast category effects on categorization.

摘要

当对一个实体应用类别术语的决策不仅涉及该实体与目标类别之间的比较,而且还受到该实体与来自目标类别同一领域的 1 个或多个替代类别的比较的影响时,就会出现对比类别对分类的影响。在自然语言类别中建立对比类别对分类的影响被证明是费力的,特别是当所涉及的类别是位于抽象的上位层次的自然种类时。我们对这些类别进行了 3 项研究,以寻找对分类的影响,包括与目标类别的相似性和与对比类别的相似性。结果使用概率阈值模型进行分析,该模型假设分类决策是由个体分类器沿着单个尺度放置阈值标准引起的,该尺度包含实验刺激物。刺激物沿着尺度的位置被证明受到与目标和对比的相似性的影响。这些发现表明,对比类别对分类的影响可能被低估了。额外的分析表明,如何在未来的研究中使用建议的模型来系统地研究对比类别对分类的影响的起源。

相似文献

1
Uncovering contrast categories in categorization with a probabilistic threshold model.用概率阈模型揭示分类中的对比类别。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Nov;37(6):1515-31. doi: 10.1037/a0024431. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
2
A probabilistic threshold model: analyzing semantic categorization data with the Rasch model.一种概率阈值模型:使用拉施模型分析语义分类数据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):216-25. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.002. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
3
A probabilistic model of cross-categorization.跨范畴分类的概率模型。
Cognition. 2011 Jul;120(1):1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.010. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
4
Contrast and assimilation in categorization and exemplar production.分类和范例生成中的对比与同化
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Feb;73(2):621-39. doi: 10.3758/s13414-010-0036-z.
5
Comparison and contrast in perceptual categorization.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1459-76. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1459.
6
Decoupling object detection and categorization.解耦目标检测与分类。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1067-79. doi: 10.1037/a0020254.
7
Causal status and coherence in causal-based categorization.基于因果关系的分类中的因果地位和连贯性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Sep;36(5):1171-206. doi: 10.1037/a0019765.
8
What some effects might not be: the time to verify membership in "well-defined" categories.有些影响可能并非如此:验证“明确界定”类别成员身份的时间。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 Nov;53(4):929-61. doi: 10.1080/713755940.
9
What's behind different kinds of kinds: effects of statistical density on learning and representation of categories.不同类型背后的原因:统计密度对类别学习和表征的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Feb;137(1):52-72. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.52.
10
Contrast effects in typicality judgements: a hierarchical Bayesian approach.典型性判断中的对比效应:一种分层贝叶斯方法。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(9):1721-39. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.662237. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-Related Degree and Criteria Differences in Semantic Categorization.语义分类中与年龄相关的程度和标准差异。
J Cogn. 2019 Jul 19;2(1):17. doi: 10.5334/joc.74.
2
Are French Fries a Vegetable? Lexical Typicality Judgement Differences in Deaf and Hearing Learners.炸薯条是蔬菜吗?聋生和听力正常学生在词汇典型性判断上的差异。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Dec;48(6):1319-1338. doi: 10.1007/s10936-019-09660-z.
3
A contrastive account of explanation generation.解释生成的对比研究
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Oct;24(5):1387-1397. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1349-x.
4
A mixture approach to vagueness and ambiguity.一种处理模糊性和歧义的混合方法。
PLoS One. 2013 May 7;8(5):e63507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063507. Print 2013.
5
The generalized polymorphous concept account of graded structure in abstract categories.广义多态概念解释抽象范畴中的渐变结构。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Aug;39(6):1117-32. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0083-2.