• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语言网络不参与物体分类。

The language network is not engaged in object categorization.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, United Kingdom.

Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2023 Sep 26;33(19):10380-10400. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad289.

DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhad289
PMID:37557910
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10545444/
Abstract

The relationship between language and thought is the subject of long-standing debate. One claim states that language facilitates categorization of objects based on a certain feature (e.g. color) through the use of category labels that reduce interference from other, irrelevant features. Therefore, language impairment is expected to affect categorization of items grouped by a single feature (low-dimensional categories, e.g. "Yellow Things") more than categorization of items that share many features (high-dimensional categories, e.g. "Animals"). To test this account, we conducted two behavioral studies with individuals with aphasia and an fMRI experiment with healthy adults. The aphasia studies showed that selective low-dimensional categorization impairment was present in some, but not all, individuals with severe anomia and was not characteristic of aphasia in general. fMRI results revealed little activity in language-responsive brain regions during both low- and high-dimensional categorization; instead, categorization recruited the domain-general multiple-demand network (involved in wide-ranging cognitive tasks). Combined, results demonstrate that the language system is not implicated in object categorization. Instead, selective low-dimensional categorization impairment might be caused by damage to brain regions responsible for cognitive control. Our work adds to the growing evidence of the dissociation between the language system and many cognitive tasks in adults.

摘要

语言和思维之间的关系是一个长期存在的争论话题。有一种观点认为,语言通过使用类别标签来促进基于某个特征(例如颜色)对物体进行分类,从而减少其他不相关特征的干扰。因此,语言障碍预计会影响基于单个特征(低维类别,例如“黄色物体”)进行的物品分类,而不是影响基于多个特征(高维类别,例如“动物”)进行的物品分类。为了验证这一说法,我们进行了两项针对失语症患者的行为研究和一项针对健康成年人的 fMRI 实验。失语症研究表明,选择性的低维分类障碍存在于一些严重命名障碍患者中,但并非所有患者都存在,且并非一般失语症的特征。fMRI 结果显示,在进行低维和高维分类时,语言反应区域的活动都很少;相反,分类任务会激活一般性的多重需求网络(涉及广泛的认知任务)。综合结果表明,语言系统与物体分类无关。相反,选择性的低维分类障碍可能是由于负责认知控制的大脑区域受损所致。我们的工作增加了越来越多的证据,证明在成年人中,语言系统与许多认知任务之间存在分离。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbea/10545444/f3b04c0388e6/bhad289f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbea/10545444/ae3bed823213/bhad289f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbea/10545444/baaa3ec2deec/bhad289f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbea/10545444/6fa4d0a0d5df/bhad289f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbea/10545444/64320d8737f8/bhad289f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbea/10545444/f177592e1f85/bhad289f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbea/10545444/f3b04c0388e6/bhad289f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbea/10545444/ae3bed823213/bhad289f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbea/10545444/baaa3ec2deec/bhad289f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbea/10545444/6fa4d0a0d5df/bhad289f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbea/10545444/64320d8737f8/bhad289f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbea/10545444/f177592e1f85/bhad289f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbea/10545444/f3b04c0388e6/bhad289f6.jpg

相似文献

1
The language network is not engaged in object categorization.语言网络不参与物体分类。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Sep 26;33(19):10380-10400. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad289.
2
Linking language and categorization: evidence from aphasia.语言与分类的联系:来自失语症的证据。
Cortex. 2013 May;49(5):1187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.06.006. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
3
Language networks in aphasia and health: A 1000 participant activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.失语症与健康中的语言网络:一项包含 1000 名参与者的激活似然估计荟萃分析。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jun;233:117960. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117960. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
Color Categorization Independent of Color Naming.颜色分类不依赖于颜色命名。
Cell Rep. 2019 Sep 3;28(10):2471-2479.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.003.
5
Categorization and category effects in normal object recognition: a PET study.正常物体识别中的分类与类别效应:一项正电子发射断层扫描研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(13):1693-703. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00082-8.
6
Investigating Language and Domain-General Processing in Neurotypicals and Individuals With Aphasia - A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Pilot Study.探究神经典型个体和失语症患者的语言及一般领域加工——一项功能近红外光谱初步研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Sep 17;15:728151. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.728151. eCollection 2021.
7
Language and thought are not the same thing: evidence from neuroimaging and neurological patients.语言和思维并非同一回事:来自神经影像学和神经疾病患者的证据。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016 Apr;1369(1):132-53. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13046. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
8
Influence of Cognitive Ability on Therapy Outcomes for Anomia in Adults With Chronic Poststroke Aphasia.认知能力对慢性中风后失语症成人命名障碍治疗效果的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Feb 1;60(2):406-421. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0384.
9
The relationship between novel word learning and anomia treatment success in adults with chronic aphasia.慢性失语症成人中新颖词汇学习与失语症治疗成功之间的关系。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jan 29;81:186-197. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.026. Epub 2015 Dec 25.
10
Neuroimaging Correlates of Post-Stroke Aphasia Rehabilitation in a Pilot Randomized Trial of Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy.在一项关于强制性失语症治疗的试点随机试验中,中风后失语症康复的神经影像学关联。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Jul 18;23:3489-3507. doi: 10.12659/msm.902301.

引用本文的文献

1
Linguistic inputs must be syntactically parsable to fully engage the language network.语言输入必须在句法上可解析,才能充分激活语言网络。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 21:2024.06.21.599332. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.21.599332.
2
The Language Network Reliably "Tracks" Naturalistic Meaningful Nonverbal Stimuli.语言网络能够可靠地“追踪”自然主义的有意义非言语刺激。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Jun 3;5(2):385-408. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00135. eCollection 2024.
3
Language is primarily a tool for communication rather than thought.语言主要是一种交流工具,而不是思维工具。

本文引用的文献

1
The Language Network Is Recruited but Not Required for Nonverbal Event Semantics.语言网络被调用,但对于非语言事件语义并非必需。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2021 Mar 17;2(2):176-201. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00030. eCollection 2021.
2
Precision fMRI reveals that the language-selective network supports both phrase-structure building and lexical access during language production.精确 fMRI 揭示语言选择网络在语言产生过程中既支持句法结构的构建,也支持词汇的获取。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Apr 4;33(8):4384-4404. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhac350.
3
Recovery from aphasia in the first year after stroke.
Nature. 2024 Jun;630(8017):575-586. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07522-w. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
4
Tracking Components of Bilingual Language Control in Speech Production: An fMRI Study Using Functional Localizers.追踪言语产生中双语语言控制的组成部分:一项使用功能定位器的功能磁共振成像研究
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Jun 3;5(2):315-340. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00128. eCollection 2024.
5
The language network as a natural kind within the broader landscape of the human brain.语言网络作为人类大脑更广阔景观中的一种自然类别。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2024 May;25(5):289-312. doi: 10.1038/s41583-024-00802-4. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
6
Dissociating language and thought in large language models.大语言模型中的语言与思维分离。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2024 Jun;28(6):517-540. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.01.011. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
中风后第一年的失语症康复。
Brain. 2023 Mar 1;146(3):1021-1039. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac129.
4
Commonalities and Asymmetries in the Neurobiological Infrastructure for Language Production and Comprehension.语言产生和理解的神经生物学基础的共性和差异。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Mar 30;32(7):1405-1418. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab287.
5
Assessing abstract thought and its relation to language with a new nonverbal paradigm: Evidence from aphasia.评估抽象思维及其与语言的关系的新非言语范式:来自失语症的证据。
Cognition. 2021 Jun;211:104622. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104622. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
6
Situating the left-lateralized language network in the broader organization of multiple specialized large-scale distributed networks.将左侧语言网络置于多个专门化的大规模分布式网络的更广泛组织中。
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Nov 1;124(5):1415-1448. doi: 10.1152/jn.00753.2019. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
7
Activity in the fronto-parietal multiple-demand network is robustly associated with individual differences in working memory and fluid intelligence.额顶叶多需求网络中的活动与工作记忆和流体智力的个体差异密切相关。
Cortex. 2020 Oct;131:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
8
Lack of selectivity for syntax relative to word meanings throughout the language network.在整个语言网络中,相对于词义而言,对句法缺乏选择性。
Cognition. 2020 Oct;203:104348. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104348. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
9
A Domain-General Cognitive Core Defined in Multimodally Parcellated Human Cortex.多模态分区人类大脑皮层定义的域泛型认知核心。
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Jun 30;30(8):4361-4380. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa023.
10
Broca's Area Is Not a Natural Kind.布罗卡区不是自然种类。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;24(4):270-284. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Feb 20.