Hamad Islam, Moghimi S Moein
University of Brighton, Molecular Targeting and Polymer Toxicology Group, School of Pharmacy, Brighton BN2 4GJ, UK.
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2008 Feb;5(2):205-19. doi: 10.1517/17425247.5.2.205.
The concept of passive and active targeting of solid tumours with intravenously administered particulate and macromolecular carriers is an attractive one that has received considerable attention and promising results have emerged from such attempts at the clinical level. Particulate and polymeric drug carriers have the capability to deliver from 2- to 10-times more drug to solid tumours compared with the administered drug in its free form, and it is through the altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the encapsulated/conjugated drugs relative to free drugs that anticancer drug-induced toxicity is dramatically reduced.
It is the intention of this article to examine the role of selected particulate and macromolecular entities as carriers of anticancer drugs and their ability to target different components of solid tumours following the intravenous route of injection, and release their cargo in a bioavailable form at levels that exceed the minimum cytotoxic concentration.
The authors of this paper have focused on carrier behaviour (pharmacokinetics of single and multiple injections, and new toxicity issues that may arise from different dosing schedules and dose intensities, as well as from the carrier itself), pathophysiological factors regulating particulate and macromolecular transport into tumours (structural arrangements of tumour vasculature, tumour vascular permeability, interstitial hypertension and interstitial transport), and biochemical and physicochemical factors controlling drug release from extravasated carriers (the bioavailable drug).
Nanoscale drug carriers can passively target solid tumours, but achieving therapeutic responses involves pathophysiological processes that control carrier transport into tumours and biochemical factors regulating drug release from extravasated carriers and maintaining free drug levels above the minimum cytotoxic concentration. It is conceivable that future sophistication in tumour targeting and the outcome of end results will depend on an improved understanding of tumour biology and biological barriers, as well as advances in carrier design and nanoengineering.
利用静脉注射的微粒和大分子载体对实体瘤进行被动和主动靶向治疗的概念很有吸引力,已受到广泛关注,并且此类尝试在临床层面已取得了令人鼓舞的成果。与以游离形式给药的药物相比,微粒和聚合物药物载体能够将多2至10倍的药物递送至实体瘤,并且正是通过包封/缀合药物相对于游离药物改变的药代动力学和药效学,抗癌药物诱导的毒性才得以显著降低。
本文旨在研究选定的微粒和大分子实体作为抗癌药物载体的作用,以及它们在静脉注射后靶向实体瘤不同成分并以超过最小细胞毒性浓度的生物可利用形式释放所载药物的能力。
本文作者重点关注载体行为(单次和多次注射的药代动力学,以及不同给药方案和剂量强度以及载体本身可能产生的新毒性问题)、调节微粒和大分子向肿瘤转运的病理生理因素(肿瘤脉管系统的结构排列、肿瘤血管通透性、间质高压和间质转运),以及控制药物从渗出载体(生物可利用药物)释放的生化和物理化学因素。
纳米级药物载体可以被动靶向实体瘤,但实现治疗反应涉及控制载体向肿瘤转运的病理生理过程以及调节药物从渗出载体释放并使游离药物水平维持在最小细胞毒性浓度以上的生化因素。可以想象,未来肿瘤靶向的精细化程度和最终结果将取决于对肿瘤生物学和生物屏障的更好理解,以及载体设计和纳米工程的进展。