Fadini Gian Paolo, Baesso Ilenia, Albiero Mattia, Sartore Saverio, Agostini Carlo, Avogaro Angelo
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Metabolic Division, University of Padova, Medical School, Italy.
Atherosclerosis. 2008 Apr;197(2):496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.12.039. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
In the last 10 years an increasing interest has been devoted to the study of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), a subtype of immature cells involved in endothelial repair and neoangiogenesis. EPCs have been discovered as a novel integrated part of the cardiovascular system, which plays a comprehensive role in tissue homeostasis. Consistently, alterations and/or reduction of the circulating EPC pool have been associated with different manifestations of cardiovascular disorders and atherosclerosis. This is why, the extent of the EPC pool is now considered a mirror of vascular health, while EPC reduction has become a surrogate biomarker of cardiovascular risk and of the ongoing vascular damage. Unfortunately, the methods used to study EPCs still lack standardization, and this is significantly decelerating progress in the field. In this review, we focus on some aspects related to the two methods used to assess circulating EPCs: flow cytometry and cell culture. We uncover the many traps hidden in the choice of the right protocol, and suggest the best solutions on the basis of evidence and background theories.
在过去十年中,内皮祖细胞(EPCs)的研究受到越来越多的关注,EPCs是一类参与内皮修复和新生血管形成的未成熟细胞亚型。EPCs已被发现是心血管系统的一个新型组成部分,在组织稳态中发挥着全面作用。相应地,循环EPC池的改变和/或减少与心血管疾病和动脉粥样硬化的不同表现相关。这就是为什么EPC池的大小现在被视为血管健康的一个指标,而EPC数量减少已成为心血管风险和正在发生的血管损伤的替代生物标志物。不幸的是,用于研究EPCs的方法仍缺乏标准化,这显著减缓了该领域的进展。在这篇综述中,我们聚焦于用于评估循环EPCs的两种方法的相关方面:流式细胞术和细胞培养。我们揭示了在选择正确方案时隐藏的许多陷阱,并根据证据和背景理论提出了最佳解决方案。