• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparing rates of trial of labour attempts, VBAC success, and fetal and maternal complications among family physicians and obstetricians.

作者信息

Russillo Balbina, Sewitch Maida J, Cardinal Linda, Brassard Normand

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal QC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Mary's Hospital Center, Montreal QC; Obstetrics Coordinator of the Family Medicine Unit, St. Mary's Hospital Center, Montreal QC.

Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal QC; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St. Mary's Hospital Center, Montreal QC.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 Feb;30(2):123-128. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32735-9.

DOI:10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32735-9
PMID:18254993
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine differences between family physicians and obstetricians in rates of trial of labour (TOL) attempt, vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC) success, and maternal-fetal complications.

METHODS

We undertook a database evaluation study in an urban Quebec secondary care hospital centre that serves a multiethnic population. Study subjects were pregnant women with at least one previous Caesarean section (CS), who delivered singletons at St. Mary's Hospital Center between January 1995 and December 2003. Outcomes were rates of TOL attempt, of VBAC success and failure, and of uterine rupture or dehiscence.

RESULTS

Of 32 500 singleton deliveries, 3694 (11.4%) women met study criteria. Of these, 3493 (94.6%) were patients of obstetricians, and 201 (5.4%) were patients of family physicians. The TOL attempt rate was 50.6% (1768) and 81.1% (163) for obstetricians and family physicians, respectively (P 0.001). For women having TOL, the VBAC success rate was 64.3% for obstetricians and 76.1% for family physicians (P = 0.002). Rates of uterine rupture or dehiscence in the combined failed and successful VBAC groups were 2.9% for obstetricians and 4.3% for family physicians (P = 0.33) whereas in the failed VBAC group the rates were 7.9% versus 17.9% for the family physicians (P = 0.04). Within delivery outcomes for successful and failed VBAC there were no differences in maternal characteristics and newborn outcomes by physician group.

CONCLUSION

More patients of family physicians than of obstetricians attempted TOL and had successful VBAC. Newborn outcomes were similar in the two groups, except that in the failed VBAC group, the family doctors had slightly higher uterine rupture or dehiscence rates; given the low power of this study, further studies are needed to confirm and explain this result. Also, given the similarity in patient profiles, the differences in delivery outcomes may be attributable to differences in physician practice styles.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparing rates of trial of labour attempts, VBAC success, and fetal and maternal complications among family physicians and obstetricians.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 Feb;30(2):123-128. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32735-9.
2
Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth.既往剖宫产术后阴道分娩指南。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Feb;27(2):164-88. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30188-8.
3
SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 (Replaces guideline Number 147), February 2005.加拿大妇产科医师协会临床实践指南。既往剖宫产术后阴道分娩指南。第155号(取代第147号指南),2005年2月
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Jun;89(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.03.015.
4
Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections.两次剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC-2)-VBAC-2 与 VBAC-1 和重复(第三次)剖宫产术的成功率和不良结局的系统评价与荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2010 Jan;117(1):5-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02351.x.
5
Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth.既往剖宫产术后阴道分娩指南。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004 Jul;26(7):660-83; quiz 684-6.
6
Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor.既往经阴道分娩或剖宫产术后经阴道分娩对试产女性产科结局的影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;104(2):273-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000134784.09455.21.
7
Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: review of antenatal predictors of success.剖宫产术后经阴道分娩:成功的产前预测因素综述。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2003 Apr;25(4):275-86. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)31030-1.
8
Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: predicting success, risks of failure.剖宫产术后经阴道分娩:预测成功率及失败风险。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004 Jun;15(6):388-93. doi: 10.1080/14767050410001724290.
9
The Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Cesarean Registry: safety and efficacy of a trial of labor in preterm pregnancy after a prior cesarean delivery.母胎医学单位剖宫产登记处:既往剖宫产术后早产患者试产的安全性和有效性
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Oct;195(4):1119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.047.
10
Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.剖宫产术后阴道分娩:新见解
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010 Mar(191):1-397.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Uterine Rupture After One Previous Cesarean Section: An Unmatched Case-Control Study.既往有一次剖宫产史后子宫破裂的预测因素:一项非匹配病例对照研究。
Int J Womens Health. 2023 Oct 4;15:1491-1500. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S427749. eCollection 2023.
2
Adjunct clinical interventions that influence vaginal birth after cesarean rates: systematic review.辅助临床干预措施对剖宫产术后阴道分娩率的影响:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 21;18(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2065-x.
3
Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.
巴勒斯坦剖宫产采用罗布森十组分类系统:一项基于人群的出生队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 24;8(10):e022875. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022875.
4
Cesarean Section Rate Analysis in University Hospital Tuzla - According to Robson's Classification.图兹拉大学医院剖宫产率分析——基于罗布森分类法
Med Arch. 2016 Jun;70(3):213-6. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2016.70.213-216. Epub 2016 May 31.
5
A Paradigm Shift to Check the Increasing Trend of Cesarean Delivery is the Need of Hour: But How?转变剖宫产率上升趋势的范式转变迫在眉睫:但如何实现呢?
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012 Aug;62(4):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0288-8. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
6
Analysis of Cesarean Section Rate - According to Robson's 10-group Classification.剖宫产率分析——基于罗布森十组分类法
Oman Med J. 2012 Sep;27(5):415-7. doi: 10.5001/omj.2012.102.