• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转变剖宫产率上升趋势的范式转变迫在眉睫:但如何实现呢?

A Paradigm Shift to Check the Increasing Trend of Cesarean Delivery is the Need of Hour: But How?

作者信息

Saha Sudarsan, Saha Soma, Das Rupkamal, Chakraborty Mayoukh, Bala Himadri Sekhar, Naskar Priyankar

机构信息

Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, 700 014 India.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012 Aug;62(4):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0288-8. Epub 2012 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1007/s13224-012-0288-8
PMID:23904696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3500955/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To check the progressive increasing trend of caesarean delivery in a tertiary facility care centre.

AIMS

The purpose of this study is to implement a paradigm shift in caesarean delivery by introducing a new classification system and a check list based management protocol.

METHODS

The study was conducted from 1st January, 2007 to 31st December, 2008 at CNMC G&O Department. All deliveries in the year 2007 were compared retrospectively and all deliveries in the year 2008 under prospective study with implementation of a new strategic protocol. Comparative audit and analysis of deliveries in retrospective and prospective year reveals significant changes in the caesarean delivery rate.

RESULTS

In retrospective group all women in labour were allowed for spontaneous delivery and in prospective group all women were subjected to intervention protocol and caesarean delivery done in both the groups in need for risk of fetal and maternal salvage. Incidence of caesarean delivery (CD) in retrospective group was 29 % while in the prospective group it was 18.4 %. Marked decrease in CD was observed for augmentation, induction and trial of labour (TOL) for delivery in prospective group. The result was compared with Robson's studies following similar type of classification system.

CONCLUSION

Marked improvement was noticed in this new paradigm and more multicentric trial is needed to check the increasing trend of CD.

摘要

目的

在一家三级医疗机构护理中心检查剖宫产率的逐步上升趋势。

目标

本研究的目的是通过引入一种新的分类系统和基于检查表的管理方案,实现剖宫产模式的转变。

方法

该研究于2007年1月1日至2008年12月31日在CNMC妇产科进行。对2007年的所有分娩进行回顾性比较,并对2008年实施新战略方案的所有分娩进行前瞻性研究。对回顾性和前瞻性年份的分娩进行比较审计和分析,发现剖宫产率有显著变化。

结果

回顾性组中所有临产妇女均允许自然分娩,前瞻性组中所有妇女均接受干预方案,两组中为挽救胎儿和产妇生命而需要进行剖宫产的情况。回顾性组的剖宫产发生率为29%,而前瞻性组为18.4%。前瞻性组中,用于分娩的引产、催产和试产的剖宫产率明显下降。将结果与采用类似分类系统的罗布森研究进行了比较。

结论

在这一新模式中观察到了显著改善,需要更多的多中心试验来检查剖宫产率的上升趋势。

相似文献

1
A Paradigm Shift to Check the Increasing Trend of Cesarean Delivery is the Need of Hour: But How?转变剖宫产率上升趋势的范式转变迫在眉睫:但如何实现呢?
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012 Aug;62(4):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0288-8. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
2
Assessment of Caesarean Section Rates at Kathmandu Model Hospital Using the Robson's Ten Group Classification System.使用罗布森十组分类系统评估加德满都示范医院的剖宫产率
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020 Jan 21;17(4):491-494. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v17i4.2117.
3
Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.针刺或指压引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 17;10(10):CD002962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002962.pub4.
4
Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth.既往剖宫产术后阴道分娩指南。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Feb;27(2):164-88. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30188-8.
5
Robson's Group 2 Criteria among Total Caesarean Sections in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.罗森 2 组标准在一家三级保健医院中的剖宫产率:一项描述性的横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2021 Nov 15;59(243):1098-1101. doi: 10.31729/jnma.7138.
6
Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth.既往剖宫产术后阴道分娩指南。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004 Jul;26(7):660-83; quiz 684-6.
7
Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.臀位的阴道分娩
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Jun;31(6):557-566. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34221-9.
8
Caesarean section rates from Malaysian tertiary hospitals using Robson's 10-group classification.马来西亚三甲医院采用罗伯逊 10 分组分类法的剖宫产率。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2760-2.
9
[Breech delivery and scarred uterus: a special obstetrical situation?].[臀位分娩与瘢痕子宫:一种特殊的产科情况?]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013 Jun;42(4):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.10.013. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
10
Secular trends in caesarean section rates over 20 years in a regional obstetric unit in Hong Kong.香港某地区产科单位20年间剖宫产率的长期趋势。
Hong Kong Med J. 2017 Aug;23(4):340-8. doi: 10.12809/hkmj176217. Epub 2017 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Obstetrics Outcomes in Women Undergoing Second-Stage Cesarean Section: A Cross-Sectional Study.接受第二阶段剖宫产的女性的产科结局:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 3;15(6):e39911. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39911. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
High Time for Routine Implementation of the Robson Ten-Group Classification for Cesarean Sections Reporting in India!!!印度是时候常规实施剖宫产报告的罗布森十组分类法了!!!
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2021 Feb;71(1):101-102. doi: 10.1007/s13224-020-01382-w. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
3
Implementation of the Robson classification in clinical practice:Lithuania's experience.罗伯逊分类法在临床实践中的应用:立陶宛的经验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 20;17(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1625-9.
4
Segregation of Patients for Intrapartum Monitoring, using Robson's Classification.采用罗布森分类法对产时监测患者进行分类。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Apr;11(4):QC15-QC18. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23115.9672. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
5
Proposing a Hybrid Model Based on Robson's Classification for Better Impact on Trends of Cesarean Deliveries.提出一种基于罗布森分类法的混合模型,以更好地影响剖宫产趋势。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2017 Jun;67(3):183-189. doi: 10.1007/s13224-016-0953-4. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
6
DECIDE: a cluster randomized controlled trial to reduce non-medically indicated caesareans in Burkina Faso.DECIDE:一项在布基纳法索减少非医学指征剖宫产的整群随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1112-8.
7
Trends in cesarean delivery: rate and indications.剖宫产的趋势:比率与指征
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014 Aug;64(4):251-4. doi: 10.1007/s13224-013-0491-2. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
8
A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it.剖宫产罗布森分类法的系统评价:哪些有效、哪些无效以及如何改进。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 3;9(6):e97769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097769. eCollection 2014.
9
A reflection on current obstetrics and gynaecology research in India.对印度当前妇产科研究的反思。
Australas Med J. 2013 Dec 31;6(12):708-12. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2013.1953. eCollection 2013.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing rates of trial of labour attempts, VBAC success, and fetal and maternal complications among family physicians and obstetricians.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 Feb;30(2):123-128. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32735-9.
2
Evidence-based vaginal birth after Caesarean section.剖宫产术后循证阴道分娩
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Feb;19(1):117-30. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
3
Primary nonmedically indicated cesarean section ("section on request"): evidence based or modern vogue?原发性非医学指征剖宫产术(“要求剖宫产”):基于证据还是现代时尚?
Clin Perinatol. 2004 Sep;31(3):409-30, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2004.05.002.
4
Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review.患者选择剖宫产:基于证据的综述。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004 Aug;59(8):601-16. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000133942.76239.57.
5
Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors.剖宫产的并发症:发生率及危险因素
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;190(2):428-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.037.
6
High caesarean rates in Madras (India): a population-based cross sectional study.印度马德拉斯地区的高剖宫产率:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
BJOG. 2003 Feb;110(2):106-11.
7
A critical appraisal of cesarean section rates at teaching hospitals in India.对印度教学医院剖宫产率的批判性评估。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Nov;79(2):151-8. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00226-6.
8
Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?我们能降低剖宫产率吗?
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001 Feb;15(1):179-94. doi: 10.1053/beog.2000.0156.
9
A high rate of caesarean sections in an affluent section of Chennai: is it cause for concern?钦奈富裕地区剖宫产率居高不下:这值得担忧吗?
Natl Med J India. 1999 Jul-Aug;12(4):156-8.
10
Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates.利用医疗审核周期降低剖宫产率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan;174(1 Pt 1):199-205. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70394-0.