Suppr超能文献

转变剖宫产率上升趋势的范式转变迫在眉睫:但如何实现呢?

A Paradigm Shift to Check the Increasing Trend of Cesarean Delivery is the Need of Hour: But How?

作者信息

Saha Sudarsan, Saha Soma, Das Rupkamal, Chakraborty Mayoukh, Bala Himadri Sekhar, Naskar Priyankar

机构信息

Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, 700 014 India.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012 Aug;62(4):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s13224-012-0288-8. Epub 2012 Oct 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To check the progressive increasing trend of caesarean delivery in a tertiary facility care centre.

AIMS

The purpose of this study is to implement a paradigm shift in caesarean delivery by introducing a new classification system and a check list based management protocol.

METHODS

The study was conducted from 1st January, 2007 to 31st December, 2008 at CNMC G&O Department. All deliveries in the year 2007 were compared retrospectively and all deliveries in the year 2008 under prospective study with implementation of a new strategic protocol. Comparative audit and analysis of deliveries in retrospective and prospective year reveals significant changes in the caesarean delivery rate.

RESULTS

In retrospective group all women in labour were allowed for spontaneous delivery and in prospective group all women were subjected to intervention protocol and caesarean delivery done in both the groups in need for risk of fetal and maternal salvage. Incidence of caesarean delivery (CD) in retrospective group was 29 % while in the prospective group it was 18.4 %. Marked decrease in CD was observed for augmentation, induction and trial of labour (TOL) for delivery in prospective group. The result was compared with Robson's studies following similar type of classification system.

CONCLUSION

Marked improvement was noticed in this new paradigm and more multicentric trial is needed to check the increasing trend of CD.

摘要

目的

在一家三级医疗机构护理中心检查剖宫产率的逐步上升趋势。

目标

本研究的目的是通过引入一种新的分类系统和基于检查表的管理方案,实现剖宫产模式的转变。

方法

该研究于2007年1月1日至2008年12月31日在CNMC妇产科进行。对2007年的所有分娩进行回顾性比较,并对2008年实施新战略方案的所有分娩进行前瞻性研究。对回顾性和前瞻性年份的分娩进行比较审计和分析,发现剖宫产率有显著变化。

结果

回顾性组中所有临产妇女均允许自然分娩,前瞻性组中所有妇女均接受干预方案,两组中为挽救胎儿和产妇生命而需要进行剖宫产的情况。回顾性组的剖宫产发生率为29%,而前瞻性组为18.4%。前瞻性组中,用于分娩的引产、催产和试产的剖宫产率明显下降。将结果与采用类似分类系统的罗布森研究进行了比较。

结论

在这一新模式中观察到了显著改善,需要更多的多中心试验来检查剖宫产率的上升趋势。

相似文献

3
Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.针刺或指压引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 17;10(10):CD002962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002962.pub4.
4
Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth.既往剖宫产术后阴道分娩指南。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Feb;27(2):164-88. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30188-8.
7
Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.臀位的阴道分娩
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009 Jun;31(6):557-566. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34221-9.
9
[Breech delivery and scarred uterus: a special obstetrical situation?].[臀位分娩与瘢痕子宫:一种特殊的产科情况?]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013 Jun;42(4):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.10.013. Epub 2013 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

4
7
Trends in cesarean delivery: rate and indications.剖宫产的趋势:比率与指征
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014 Aug;64(4):251-4. doi: 10.1007/s13224-013-0491-2. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
9
A reflection on current obstetrics and gynaecology research in India.对印度当前妇产科研究的反思。
Australas Med J. 2013 Dec 31;6(12):708-12. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2013.1953. eCollection 2013.

本文引用的文献

2
Evidence-based vaginal birth after Caesarean section.剖宫产术后循证阴道分娩
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Feb;19(1):117-30. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.10.015. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
4
Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review.患者选择剖宫产:基于证据的综述。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004 Aug;59(8):601-16. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000133942.76239.57.
5
Complications of cesarean deliveries: rates and risk factors.剖宫产的并发症:发生率及危险因素
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;190(2):428-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.08.037.
8
Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?我们能降低剖宫产率吗?
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001 Feb;15(1):179-94. doi: 10.1053/beog.2000.0156.
10
Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates.利用医疗审核周期降低剖宫产率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan;174(1 Pt 1):199-205. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70394-0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验