Cook Aonghais, Rushton Steven, Allan John, Baxter Andrew
Institute for Research into Environmental Sustainability, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 5AB, United Kingdom.
Environ Manage. 2008 Jun;41(6):834-43. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9077-7.
Birds feeding on landfill sites cause problems in terms of nuisance to neighbors, flight safety, a threat to public health, and affecting the day to day site operation. A number of control measures exist to deter problem species; however, research into their effectiveness across sites and for multiple species has been limited. We use a modeling approach in order to assess the effectiveness of nine techniques--pyrotechnics, hand-held distress calls, static distress calls, blank ammunition, a combination of blank and lethal use of ammunition, the use of falcons, the use of hawks, wailers and helium-filled bird-scaring kites --at deterring three commonly recorded species--the Black-headed Gull (Larus ridibundus), the Herring Gull (Larus argentatus) and the Lesser Black-backed Gull (Larus fuscus)--from six landfill sites across the United Kingdom. The use of distress calls, falconry, and combinations of lethal and nonlethal use of ammunition were the most effective techniques for initially deterring birds from these sites. However, when habituation is considered, there is a clear difference between techniques such as falconry, which have a lethal aspect and may act to reinforce the deterrence, and the use of techniques such as distress calls, which do not. However there are problems related to legislation and public perception when lethal techniques are used.
在垃圾填埋场觅食的鸟类会给周边邻居带来滋扰、影响飞行安全、威胁公众健康,并干扰垃圾填埋场的日常运营。现已有多种控制措施来驱赶造成问题的鸟类物种;然而,针对这些措施在不同场地对多个物种的有效性的研究却很有限。我们采用建模方法来评估九种技术——烟火、手持遇险呼叫器、固定遇险呼叫器、空包弹、空包弹与实弹结合使用、使用猎鹰、使用鹰、警报器以及充氦气的驱鸟风筝——对英国六个垃圾填埋场中三种常见鸟类——黑头鸥(Larus ridibundus)、银鸥(Larus argentatus)和小黑背鸥(Larus fuscus)——的驱赶效果。使用遇险呼叫器、放鹰狩猎以及实弹与非实弹结合使用是最初驱赶这些场地鸟类最有效的技术。然而,考虑到习惯化因素,具有致命性且可能强化威慑作用的放鹰狩猎等技术与不具有致命性的遇险呼叫器等技术之间存在明显差异。不过,使用致命技术时会涉及立法和公众认知方面的问题。