Suppr超能文献

测试儿童语言表征的抽象性:幼儿句法结构的词汇和结构启动

Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children.

作者信息

Savage Ceri, Lieven Elena, Theakston Anna, Tomasello Michael

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Manchester University, UK.

出版信息

Dev Sci. 2003 Nov 1;6(5):557-567. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00312.

Abstract

The current studies used a priming methodology to assess the abstractness of children's early syntactic constructions. In the main study, 3-, 4- and 6-year-old children were asked to describe a prime picture by repeating either an active or a passive sentence, and then they were left to their own devices to describe a target picture. For half the children at each age, the prime sentences they repeated had high lexical overlap with the sentence they were likely to produce for the target, whereas for the other half there was very low lexical overlap between prime and target. The main result was that 6-year-old children showed both lexical and structural priming for both the active transitive and passive constructions, whereas 3- and 4-year-old children showed lexical priming only. This pattern of results would seem to indicate that 6-year-old children have relatively abstract representations of these constructions, whereas 3- and 4-year-old children have as an integral part of their representations certain specific lexical items, especially pronouns and some grammatical morphemes. In a second study it was found that children did not need to repeat the prime out loud in order to be primed - suggesting that the priming effect observed concerns not just peripheral production mechanisms but underlying linguistic representations common to comprehension and production. These results support the view that young children develop abstract linguistic representations gradually during the preschool years.

摘要

当前的研究采用启动法来评估儿童早期句法结构的抽象程度。在主要研究中,要求3岁、4岁和6岁的儿童通过重复主动句或被动句来描述启动图片,然后让他们自主描述目标图片。在每个年龄段的儿童中,一半儿童重复的启动句与他们可能为目标图片生成的句子有高度的词汇重叠,而另一半儿童的启动句与目标句之间的词汇重叠非常低。主要结果是,6岁儿童在主动及物结构和被动结构上都表现出词汇和结构启动效应,而3岁和4岁儿童仅表现出词汇启动效应。这种结果模式似乎表明,6岁儿童对这些结构有相对抽象的表征,而3岁和4岁儿童在其表征中作为一个不可或缺的部分包含某些特定的词汇项,尤其是代词和一些语法语素。在第二项研究中发现,儿童无需大声重复启动句就能受到启动——这表明观察到的启动效应不仅涉及外围的生成机制,还涉及理解和生成所共有的潜在语言表征。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即幼儿在学前阶段逐渐发展出抽象的语言表征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de9b/2231515/80f9d4eba038/nihms-992-f0001.jpg

相似文献

6
Early syntactic productivity: evidence from dative shift.早期句法生成能力:与格转换的证据
Cognition. 2007 May;103(2):163-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 May 4.
8
Structural Priming for Sentence Production in Aphasia: What Does Oral Repetition Do?失语症句子生成中的结构启动:口语复述有何作用?
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2025 Mar 5;68(3):1161-1174. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00216. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
9

引用本文的文献

2
Structural priming during comprehension: A pattern from many pieces.理解中的结构启动:来自多方面的模式。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Jun;30(3):882-896. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02209-7. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
8
Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?主题角色:核心知识还是语言结构?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1850-1869. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01634-5.

本文引用的文献

5
Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue.对话中的句法协调。
Cognition. 2000 May 15;75(2):B13-25. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00081-5.
7
Activation of syntactic information during language production.语言生成过程中句法信息的激活。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2000 Mar;29(2):205-16. doi: 10.1023/a:1005149129259.
8
Do young children have adult syntactic competence?幼儿具备成人的句法能力吗?
Cognition. 2000 Mar 14;74(3):209-53. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(99)00069-4.
9
Syntactic persistence in Dutch.荷兰语中的句法持久性。
Lang Speech. 1998 Apr-Jun;41 ( Pt 2):143-84. doi: 10.1177/002383099804100202.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验