Lee Jiyeon
Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University.
Aphasiology. 2020;34(4):391-410. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1665963. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
Healthy speakers use both word-level and structure-level information to ease sentence production processes. Structural priming facilitates message-structure mapping in aphasia. However, it remains unclear if and how word-level information affects off-line and on-line sentence production in persons with aphasia (PWA). This eyetracking-while-speaking study examined the effect of lexical priming on production of syntactic (active/passive) structures in PWA.
Eleven PWA and twenty healthy older adults (HOA) described transitive actions () following lexical priming, wherein the relative ease of lexical retrieval for the Agent or Theme was manipulated via an auditory probe ( ). It was examined whether or not PWA produce the sentence structure that allows earlier production of the primed word (e.g., passives when Theme was primed). Participants' eye fixation times to each character (Agent, Theme) were also monitored to examine if PWA show priming-induced preferential looks to one character from the earliest stage of production, consistent with word-driven planning.
HOA showed increased production of passives over actives in the Theme vs. Agent prime condition. In eye fixation data, HOA showed priming-induced Theme advantage from the earliest time window (picture onset-400 milliseconds). PWA also showed a significant priming effect in off-line sentence production, with this priming effect being greater for the individuals whose syntactic processing is better preserved. In eye fixation data, however, PWA showed preferential fixations to the primed character at a later stage of sentence planning (400-800 milliseconds), following equal fixation time to Agent and Theme during the earliest time window.
HOA showed word-driven production in both off-line and real-time (eye fixations) production. Lexical accessibility effectively drove off-line syntactic production in PWA, especially for those whose syntactic capacity remains relatively preserved. However, PWA showed advanced processing of both characters in earliest eye fixation data, suggesting that successful word-driven off-line syntactic production was associated with atypical real-time sentence planning in aphasia.
健康的说话者会利用词汇层面和结构层面的信息来简化句子生成过程。结构启动效应有助于失语症患者进行信息结构映射。然而,词汇层面的信息是否以及如何影响失语症患者的离线和在线句子生成仍不清楚。这项边说边眼动追踪研究考察了词汇启动对失语症患者句法(主动/被动)结构生成的影响。
11名失语症患者和20名健康老年人在词汇启动后描述及物动作,其中施事或受事的词汇检索相对难易程度通过听觉探针进行操控。研究考察了失语症患者是否会生成能让启动词更早出现的句子结构(例如,当受事被启动时生成被动句)。还监测了参与者对每个字符(施事、受事)的注视时间,以考察失语症患者在生成的最早阶段是否会表现出启动诱导的对某个字符的优先注视,这与词汇驱动的规划一致。
在受事与施事启动条件下,健康老年人生成的被动句比主动句更多。在眼动注视数据中,健康老年人从最早的时间窗口(图片呈现后400毫秒)就表现出启动诱导的受事优势。失语症患者在离线句子生成中也表现出显著的启动效应,句法加工保存较好的个体这种启动效应更大。然而,在眼动注视数据中,失语症患者在句子规划的后期阶段(400 - 800毫秒)才表现出对启动字符的优先注视,在最早的时间窗口对施事和受事的注视时间相同。
健康老年人在离线和实时(眼动注视)生成中都表现出词汇驱动的生成。词汇可及性有效地驱动了失语症患者的离线句法生成,尤其是对于那些句法能力相对保留的患者。然而,失语症患者在最早的眼动注视数据中对两个字符都进行了提前加工,这表明成功的词汇驱动离线句法生成与失语症患者非典型的实时句子规划有关。