Fisher Derek J, Labelle Alain, Knott Verner J
Department of Psychology/Institute of Neuroscience, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ont., Canada.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Apr;119(4):909-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
To examine pre-attentive acoustic change detection in schizophrenia patients with and without auditory hallucinations via mismatch negativity (MMN) extracted from a multi-feature paradigm.
This study examined the electroencephalograph (EEG)-derived MMN, recorded across 32 sites, in 12 hallucinating patients (HPs) with schizophrenia, 12 non-hallucinating patients (NPs) with schizophrenia and 12 healthy controls (HCs). MMN was recorded in response to a multi-feature MMN paradigm [Näätänen, R., et al., 2004. The mismatch negativity (MMN): towards the optimal paradigm. Clin. Neurophys. 115, 140-144] which employs frequency, duration, intensity, location and gap deviants. Differences in source localization were probed using standardized low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA).
HPs showed significantly smaller MMNs to duration deviants compared to HCs and NPs, as well as smaller MMNs to intensity deviants compared to HCs. Regionalized differences between HCs and each of the patient groups were observed in response to frequency deviants. There were no significant group effects for location or gap deviants, or for MMN latency. Source localization using sLORETA showed no significant differences in MMN generator location across groups for any of the deviant stimuli.
The often-reported robust MMN deficit to duration deviants may be specific to schizophrenia patients afflicted with auditory hallucinations. Furthermore, by using symptom-specific groups, novel deficits of pre-attentive auditory processing, such as that observed to intensity deviants in HPs, may be revealed.
The differential responding observed between both groups of patients with schizophrenia has implications for automatic processing within the auditory cortex of hallucinating patients and suggests that care must be taken when recruiting participants in studies involving schizophrenia to ensure consistent, replicable results.
通过从多特征范式中提取的失匹配负波(MMN),研究有和没有幻听的精神分裂症患者的前注意听觉变化检测。
本研究检测了12名有幻听的精神分裂症患者(HP)、12名无幻听的精神分裂症患者(NP)和12名健康对照者(HC)在32个部位记录的脑电图(EEG)衍生的MMN。MMN是针对多特征MMN范式[Näätänen, R., 等人,2004年。失匹配负波(MMN):走向最佳范式。临床神经生理学。115, 140 - 144]记录的,该范式采用频率、持续时间、强度、位置和间隙偏差刺激。使用标准化低分辨率脑电磁断层扫描(sLORETA)探究源定位的差异。
与HC和NP相比,HP对持续时间偏差刺激的MMN显著更小,与HC相比,对强度偏差刺激的MMN也更小。在对频率偏差刺激的反应中,观察到HC与每个患者组之间的区域差异。对于位置或间隙偏差刺激以及MMN潜伏期,没有显著的组间效应。使用sLORETA进行源定位显示,对于任何偏差刺激,各组之间MMN发生器位置没有显著差异。
经常报道的对持续时间偏差刺激的明显MMN缺陷可能特定于患有幻听的精神分裂症患者。此外,通过使用症状特定的组,可能会揭示前注意听觉处理的新缺陷,例如在HP中观察到的对强度偏差刺激的缺陷。
两组精神分裂症患者之间观察到的差异反应对有幻听患者听觉皮层内的自动处理有影响,并表明在招募精神分裂症研究参与者时必须谨慎,以确保结果一致、可重复。