Warren W H, Mestre D R, Blackwell A W, Morris M W
Department of Psychology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Feb;17(1):28-43. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.17.1.28.
Observers viewed random-dot optical flow displays that simulated self-motion on a circular path and judged whether they would pass to the right or left of a target at 16 m. Two dots in two frames are theoretically sufficient to specify circular heading if the orientation of the rotation axis is known. Heading accuracies were better than 1.5 degrees with a ground surface, wall surface, and 3D cloud of dots, and were constant over densities down to 2 dots, consistent with the theory. However, there was an inverse relation between the radius of the observer's path and constant heading error, such that at small radii observers reported heading 3 degrees to the outside of the actual path with the ground and to the inside with the wall and cloud. This may be an artifact of a small display screen.
观察者观看了模拟在圆形路径上自我运动的随机点光流显示,并判断他们是否会在16米处从目标的右侧或左侧通过。如果已知旋转轴的方向,理论上两帧中的两个点就足以确定圆形航向。在有地面、墙面和三维点云的情况下,航向精度优于1.5度,并且在低至2个点的密度下保持恒定,这与理论一致。然而,观察者路径的半径与恒定航向误差之间存在反比关系,以至于在小半径情况下,观察者报告在有地面的情况下航向偏离实际路径外侧3度,在有墙面和点云的情况下航向偏离实际路径内侧。这可能是小显示屏造成的假象。