• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

赛车手与非赛车手之间的差异:一项使用眼动追踪技术的模拟器研究。

Differences between racing and non-racing drivers: A simulator study using eye-tracking.

作者信息

van Leeuwen Peter M, de Groot Stefan, Happee Riender, de Winter Joost C F

机构信息

Delft University of Technology, Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Mekelweg 2, CD Delft, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0186871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186871. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0186871
PMID:29121090
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5679571/
Abstract

Motorsport has developed into a professional international competition. However, limited research is available on the perceptual and cognitive skills of racing drivers. By means of a racing simulator, we compared the driving performance of seven racing drivers with ten non-racing drivers. Participants were tasked to drive the fastest possible lap time. Additionally, both groups completed a choice reaction time task and a tracking task. Results from the simulator showed faster lap times, higher steering activity, and a more optimal racing line for the racing drivers than for the non-racing drivers. The non-racing drivers' gaze behavior corresponded to the tangent point model, whereas racing drivers showed a more variable gaze behavior combined with larger head rotations while cornering. Results from the choice reaction time task and tracking task showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Our results are consistent with the current consensus in sports sciences in that task-specific differences exist between experts and novices while there are no major differences in general cognitive and motor abilities.

摘要

赛车运动已发展成为一项专业的国际赛事。然而,关于赛车手感知和认知技能的研究却很有限。通过赛车模拟器,我们比较了7名赛车手和10名非赛车手的驾驶表现。参与者的任务是尽可能快地完成一圈驾驶。此外,两组人员都完成了选择反应时间任务和跟踪任务。模拟器的结果显示,与非赛车手相比,赛车手的单圈用时更短、转向活动更多,并且赛车线路更优。非赛车手的注视行为符合切点模型,而赛车手在过弯时表现出更具变化性的注视行为,同时头部转动幅度更大。选择反应时间任务和跟踪任务的结果显示,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。我们的结果与体育科学领域目前的共识一致,即专家和新手在特定任务上存在差异,而在一般认知和运动能力方面没有重大差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/5e995bc44f84/pone.0186871.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/cfc65dbcbb54/pone.0186871.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/a28898733aaa/pone.0186871.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/42d2aac614c2/pone.0186871.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/3c277f7e80fd/pone.0186871.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/64c84f02ccea/pone.0186871.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/f581fa8f062f/pone.0186871.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/531bd3bfcf9c/pone.0186871.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/5e995bc44f84/pone.0186871.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/cfc65dbcbb54/pone.0186871.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/a28898733aaa/pone.0186871.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/42d2aac614c2/pone.0186871.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/3c277f7e80fd/pone.0186871.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/64c84f02ccea/pone.0186871.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/f581fa8f062f/pone.0186871.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/531bd3bfcf9c/pone.0186871.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea1c/5679571/5e995bc44f84/pone.0186871.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences between racing and non-racing drivers: A simulator study using eye-tracking.赛车手与非赛车手之间的差异:一项使用眼动追踪技术的模拟器研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0186871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186871. eCollection 2017.
2
Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.密切关注:在高度自动驾驶过程中,注视行为作为衡量自动化信任度的指标
Hum Factors. 2016 May;58(3):509-19. doi: 10.1177/0018720815625744. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
3
Reactivity, stability, and strength performance capacity in motor sports.赛车运动中的反应性、稳定性和力量表现能力。
Br J Sports Med. 2006 Nov;40(11):906-10; discussion 911. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.025783. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
4
Comparing driving behavior of humans and autonomous driving in a professional racing simulator.在专业赛车模拟器中比较人类驾驶行为与自动驾驶行为。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 3;16(2):e0245320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245320. eCollection 2021.
5
Eye-head coordination and dynamic visual scanning as indicators of visuo-cognitive demands in driving simulator.眼头协调和动态视觉扫描作为驾驶模拟器中视认知需求的指标。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0240201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240201. eCollection 2020.
6
The effect of steering-system linearity, simulator motion, and truck driving experience on steering of an articulated tractor-semitrailer combination.转向系统线性、模拟器运动和卡车驾驶经验对铰接式拖拉机-挂车组合转向的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Sep;71:17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
7
My heart is racing! Psychophysiological dynamics of skilled racecar drivers.我的心跳加速!职业赛车手的心理生理动力学。
J Sports Sci. 2015;33(9):945-59. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.977940. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
8
Combining experiences of race gaming and natural driving affects gaze location strategy in simulated context.结合赛车游戏和自然驾驶经验会影响模拟情境中的注视位置策略。
Ergonomics. 2019 Nov;62(11):1392-1399. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1652770. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
9
Longitudinal Outcomes of Cumulative Impact Exposure on Oculomotor Functioning in Professional Motorsport Drivers.职业赛车手累积影响暴露对眼球运动功能的纵向结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2311086. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.11086.
10
Eye movements drive steering: reduced eye movement distribution impairs steering and driving performance.眼球运动驱动转向:眼球运动分布减少会损害转向和驾驶性能。
J Mot Behav. 2008 May;40(3):190-202. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.40.3.190-202.

引用本文的文献

1
The racer's gaze: Visual strategy in high-speed sports expertise.赛车手的目光:高速运动专长中的视觉策略。
J Vis. 2025 Jul 1;25(8):16. doi: 10.1167/jov.25.8.16.
2
A Comparative Performance Analysis of Load Cell and Hall-Effect Brake Sensors in Sim Racing.模拟赛车中称重传感器与霍尔效应制动传感器的性能对比分析
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jun 21;25(13):3872. doi: 10.3390/s25133872.
3
The Use of Extended Reality Technologies in Sport Perceptual-Cognitive Skill Research: A Systematic Scoping Review.扩展现实技术在运动感知认知技能研究中的应用:一项系统综述。

本文引用的文献

1
The Relationship Between Deliberate Practice and Performance in Sports: A Meta-Analysis.刻意练习与运动表现的关系:一项元分析。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 May;11(3):333-50. doi: 10.1177/1745691616635591.
2
The Racer's Brain - How Domain Expertise is Reflected in the Neural Substrates of Driving.赛车手的大脑——领域专长如何在驾驶的神经基质中体现。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Nov 24;9:635. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00635. eCollection 2015.
3
Effects of visual fidelity on curve negotiation, gaze behaviour and simulator discomfort.
Sports Med Open. 2024 Nov 29;10(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00794-6.
4
Effects of multimodal explanations for autonomous driving on driving performance, cognitive load, expertise, confidence, and trust.自动驾驶的多模式解释对驾驶性能、认知负荷、专业知识、信心和信任的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 6;14(1):13061. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62052-9.
5
Less Is More: Higher-Skilled Sim Racers Allocate Significantly Less Attention to the Track Relative to the Display Features than Lower-Skilled Sim Racers.少即是多:与低技能模拟赛车手相比,高技能模拟赛车手在赛道上分配的注意力明显少于对显示特征的注意力。
Vision (Basel). 2024 Apr 29;8(2):27. doi: 10.3390/vision8020027.
6
Highly reproducible eyeblink timing during formula car driving.在方程式赛车驾驶过程中高度可重复的眨眼时间。
iScience. 2023 May 19;26(6):106803. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106803. eCollection 2023 Jun 16.
7
An embodied and ecological approach to skill acquisition in racecar driving.一种关于赛车驾驶技能习得的具身化与生态化方法。
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Feb 22;5:1095639. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1095639. eCollection 2023.
8
Application of a Reactive Agility Training Program Using Light-Based Stimuli to Enhance the Physical and Cognitive Performance of Car Racing Drivers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.应用基于光刺激的反应敏捷训练计划提高赛车手的身体和认知表现:一项随机对照试验。
Sports Med Open. 2022 Sep 5;8(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00509-9.
9
Egocentric Chunking in the Predictive Brain: A Cognitive Basis of Expert Performance in High-Speed Sports.预测性大脑中的自我中心组块:高速运动中专家表现的认知基础。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Apr 12;16:822887. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.822887. eCollection 2022.
10
Gaze Strategies in Driving-An Ecological Approach.驾驶中的注视策略——一种生态学方法
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 14;13:821440. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.821440. eCollection 2022.
视觉逼真度对弯道通过、注视行为及模拟器不适感的影响。
Ergonomics. 2015;58(8):1347-64. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1005172. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
4
My heart is racing! Psychophysiological dynamics of skilled racecar drivers.我的心跳加速!职业赛车手的心理生理动力学。
J Sports Sci. 2015;33(9):945-59. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.977940. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
5
It's not all in your car: functional and structural correlates of exceptional driving skills in professional racers.并非全在车内:职业赛车手非凡驾驶技能的功能和结构相关性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Nov 11;8:888. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00888. eCollection 2014.
6
How skill expertise shapes the brain functional architecture: an fMRI study of visuo-spatial and motor processing in professional racing-car and naïve drivers.技能专长如何塑造大脑功能结构:职业赛车手和新手司机的视空间和运动加工的 fMRI 研究。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 18;8(10):e77764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077764. eCollection 2013.
7
The case for driver science in motorsport: a review and recommendations.赛车运动中驾驶员科学的案例:综述与建议
Sports Med. 2013 Jul;43(7):565-74. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0040-2.
8
The effects of control-display gain on performance of race car drivers in an isometric braking task.控制-显示增益对赛车手在等长制动任务中表现的影响。
J Sports Sci. 2012 Dec;30(16):1747-56. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.713978. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
9
A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: the Deary-Liewald reaction time task.一款免费、易用、基于计算机的简单四择一反应时程序:Deary-Liewald 反应时任务。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Mar;43(1):258-68. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0024-1.
10
Errors and violations on the roads: a real distinction?道路上的错误和违规:真正的区别?
Ergonomics. 1990 Oct-Nov;33(10-11):1315-32. doi: 10.1080/00140139008925335.