Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow.

We examined the ability to use optic flow to judge heading when different parts of the retina are stimulated and when the specified heading is in different directions relative to the display. To do so, we manipulated retinal eccentricity (the angle between the fovea and the center of the stimulus) and heading eccentricity (the angle between the specified heading and the center of the stimulus) independently. Observers viewed two sequences of moving dots that simulated translation through a random cloud of dots. They reported whether the direction of translation--the heading--in the second sequence was to the left or right of the direction in the first sequence. The results revealed a large and consistent effect of heading eccentricity: Judgments were much more accurate with radial flow fields (small heading eccentricities) than with lamellar fields (large heading eccentricities), regardless of the part of the retina being stimulated. The results also revealed a smaller and less consistent effect of retinal eccentricity: With radial flow (small heading eccentricities), judgments were more accurate when the stimulus was presented near the fovea. The variation of heading thresholds from radial to lamellar flow fields is predicted by a simple model of two-dimensional motion discrimination. The fact that the predictions are accurate implies that the human visual system is equally efficient at processing radial and lamellar flow fields. In addition, efficiency is reasonably constant no matter what part of the retina is being stimulated.