• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Guinea-pigging: healthy human subjects for drug safety trials are in demand. But is it a living?

作者信息

Elliott Carl

机构信息

Center for Bioethics, University of Minnesota.

出版信息

New Yorker. 2008 Jan 7:36-41.

PMID:18265451
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Guinea-pigging: healthy human subjects for drug safety trials are in demand. But is it a living?人体试验：药物安全试验需要健康的人类受试者。但这算一种职业吗？
New Yorker. 2008 Jan 7:36-41.
2
The right to a trial: Should dying patients have access to experimental drugs?审判权：临终患者是否应有权使用实验性药物？
New Yorker. 2006 Dec 18:40-7.
3
Guinea-pigging.豚鼠实验法
Minn Med. 2008 Apr;91(4):32-6.
4
Open channels: Do new cystic-fibrosis therapies hold the key to treating other genetic disorders?开放通道：新型囊性纤维化疗法是治疗其他遗传疾病的关键吗？
New Yorker. 2009 May 4:30-4.
5
Legal and ethical issues associated with patient recruitment in clinical trials: the case of competitive enrolment.临床试验中与患者招募相关的法律和伦理问题：竞争性入组案例
Health Law Rev. 2005;13(2-3):58-61.
6
Regulating the market in human research participants.规范人类研究参与者市场。
PLoS Med. 2006 Aug;3(8):e330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030330.
7
The quiet rise of the clinical contractor.临床承包商的悄然崛起。
Nature. 2006 May 4;441(7089):22-3. doi: 10.1038/441022a.
8
Respondent burden in clinical research: when are we asking too much of subjects?临床研究中的受试者负担：我们何时对受试者要求过多？
IRB. 2005 Jul-Aug;27(4):17-20.
9
Undue fear of inducements in research in developing countries.对发展中国家研究中诱导因素的过度担忧。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2009 Apr;18(2):122-9. doi: 10.1017/S0963180109090215.
10
Patients, physicians, and clinical trials: the other side of the coins.患者、医生与临床试验：硬币的另一面。
J Investig Med. 1999 Sep;47(8):343-57.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the participant experience in controlled human infection model (CHIM) trials: A modified grounded theory study.探索可控人类感染模型（CHIM）试验中的参与者体验：一项修正的扎根理论研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 6;20(8):e0328378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328378. eCollection 2025.
2
Mutual Emotional Labor as Method: Building Connections of Care in Qualitative Research.作为方法的相互情感劳动：在定性研究中建立关怀联系
Qual Rep. 2023 Nov;28(11):3192-3212. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6251.
3
Better recognition for research participants: what society should learn from covid-19.
更好地识别研究参与者：社会应该从新冠疫情中吸取的教训。
BMJ. 2023 Jan 17;380:e071178. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071178.
4
Ethical Criteria for Improved Human Subject Protections in Phase I Healthy Volunteer Trials.提高 I 期健康志愿者试验中人类受试者保护的伦理标准。
Ethics Hum Res. 2022 Sep;44(5):2-21. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500139.
5
The ethical anatomy of payment for research participants.研究参与者付费的伦理剖析。
Med Health Care Philos. 2022 Sep;25(3):449-464. doi: 10.1007/s11019-022-10092-1. Epub 2022 May 24.
6
Healthy volunteers in US phase I clinical trials: Sociodemographic characteristics and participation over time.美国 I 期临床试验中的健康志愿者：社会人口学特征和随时间的参与情况。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 7;16(9):e0256994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256994. eCollection 2021.
7
Speculating on Precarious Income: Finance Cultures and the Risky Strategies of Healthy Volunteers in Clinical Drug Trials.揣测不稳定收入：金融文化与临床药物试验中健康志愿者的风险策略
J Cult Econ. 2021;14(4):464-484. doi: 10.1080/17530350.2020.1850504. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
8
Phase I trial compensation: How much do healthy volunteers actually earn from clinical trial enrollment?I 期临床试验补偿：健康志愿者参与临床试验实际能挣多少？
Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):477-487. doi: 10.1177/17407745211011069. Epub 2021 May 2.
9
"My Body is One of the Best Commodities": Exploring the Ethics of Commodification in Phase I Healthy Volunteer Clinical Trials.“我的身体是最优质的商品之一”：探究I期健康志愿者临床试验中商品化的伦理问题
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2019;29(4):305-331. doi: 10.1353/ken.2019.0028.
10
Picking and Choosing Among Phase I Trials : A Qualitative Examination of How Healthy Volunteers Understand Study Risks.在 I 期临床试验中进行选择：一项关于健康志愿者如何理解研究风险的定性研究。
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Dec;16(4):535-549. doi: 10.1007/s11673-019-09946-w. Epub 2019 Nov 12.