• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为方法的相互情感劳动:在定性研究中建立关怀联系

Mutual Emotional Labor as Method: Building Connections of Care in Qualitative Research.

作者信息

Fisher Jill A, Monahan Torin

机构信息

Department of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of North Carolina, North Carolina, USA.

Department of Communication, University of North Carolina, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Qual Rep. 2023 Nov;28(11):3192-3212. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6251.

DOI:10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6251
PMID:39386316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11464001/
Abstract

Emotional labor may be vital to the success of qualitative research studies, particularly longitudinal studies that depend on the maintenance of research relationships over time. Rather than being limited to the comportment of researchers toward their participants, however, we find that participants also actively engage in practices of emotional labor to manage researchers and guide research interactions. We document elements of such "mutual emotional labor" in the establishment of rapport, in crafting experiences of personalized therapeutic benefit from participating in interviews, and in efforts to navigate closure at the conclusion of research projects. We argue that by recognizing forms of reciprocal emotion management, researchers may be better equipped to engage in ethical research practices that serve not only knowledge production but also human connection and care.

摘要

情感劳动对于定性研究的成功可能至关重要,尤其是对于那些依赖于长期维持研究关系的纵向研究。然而,我们发现,情感劳动并不局限于研究人员对参与者的行为举止,参与者也会积极参与情感劳动实践,以管理研究人员并引导研究互动。我们记录了这种“相互情感劳动”在建立融洽关系、从参与访谈中精心打造个性化治疗益处的体验以及在研究项目结束时努力处理收尾工作等方面的要素。我们认为,通过认识到相互情感管理的形式,研究人员可能更有能力从事符合伦理的研究实践,这些实践不仅服务于知识生产,还服务于人际关系和关怀。

相似文献

1
Mutual Emotional Labor as Method: Building Connections of Care in Qualitative Research.作为方法的相互情感劳动:在定性研究中建立关怀联系
Qual Rep. 2023 Nov;28(11):3192-3212. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6251.
2
Emotional Labor in Dementia Research.
Qual Health Res. 2024 Oct 17:10497323241274709. doi: 10.1177/10497323241274709.
3
Exploring Nurse and Patient Experiences of Developing Rapport During Oncology Ambulatory Care Videoconferencing Visits: Protocol for a Qualitative Study.探索肿瘤门诊护理视频会议就诊期间建立融洽关系的护士与患者体验:一项定性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jun 14;10(6):e27940. doi: 10.2196/27940.
4
Exploring Nurse and Patient Experiences of Developing Rapport During Oncology Ambulatory Care Videoconferencing Visits: Qualitative Descriptive Study.探索肿瘤门诊视频会诊中护士和患者建立融洽关系的体验:定性描述性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 8;24(9):e39920. doi: 10.2196/39920.
5
Emotion work in qualitative research: interviewing parents about neonatal care.定性研究中的情感工作:就新生儿护理问题采访父母。
Nurse Res. 2017 Dec 18;25(3):26-30. doi: 10.7748/nr.2017.e1532.
6
Whakawhanaungatanga-Building trust and connections: A qualitative study indigenous Māori patients and whānau (extended family network) hospital experiences.建立信任和联系:一项针对毛利族患者及其家庭(大家庭网络)的医院体验的定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Apr;80(4):1545-1558. doi: 10.1111/jan.15912. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
7
Clinical empathy as emotional labor in the patient-physician relationship.临床同理心作为医患关系中的情感劳动。
JAMA. 2005 Mar 2;293(9):1100-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.9.1100.
8
Qualitative Study定性研究
9
Staff and patient perspectives on therapeutic engagement during one-to-one observation.员工和患者对一对一观察期间治疗参与的看法。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Nov;25(9-10):546-557. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12497. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
10
An account from the inside: Examining the emotional impact of qualitative research through the lens of "insider" research.来自内部的叙述:通过“内部人士”研究的视角审视定性研究的情感影响。
Qual Psychol. 2017 Nov;4(3):326-337. doi: 10.1037/qup0000064. Epub 2017 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Children's emerging concepts of resilience: insights from using body mapping in an East London cohort sample of 7-10-year-old children.儿童对复原力的新兴概念:在东伦敦7至10岁儿童队列样本中使用身体图谱的见解。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 6;15:1408771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1408771. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Healthy volunteers in US phase I clinical trials: Sociodemographic characteristics and participation over time.美国 I 期临床试验中的健康志愿者:社会人口学特征和随时间的参与情况。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 7;16(9):e0256994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256994. eCollection 2021.
2
Phase I trial compensation: How much do healthy volunteers actually earn from clinical trial enrollment?I 期临床试验补偿:健康志愿者参与临床试验实际能挣多少?
Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;18(4):477-487. doi: 10.1177/17407745211011069. Epub 2021 May 2.
3
Sacrificial Labour: Social Inequality, Identity Work, and the Damaging Pursuit of Elusive Futures.牺牲性劳动:社会不平等、身份认同工作与对难以捉摸的未来的有害追求
Work Employ Soc. 2020 Jun;34(3):441-456. doi: 10.1177/0950017019885069. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
4
Healthy volunteers' perceptions of risk in US Phase I clinical trials: A mixed-methods study.健康志愿者对美国 I 期临床试验风险的认知:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 20;15(11):e1002698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002698. eCollection 2018 Nov.
5
Using "clinical trial diaries" to track patterns of participation for serial healthy volunteers in U.S. phase I studies.使用“临床试验日记”追踪美国I期研究中连续健康志愿者的参与模式。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Feb;10(1):65-75. doi: 10.1177/1556264614568280. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
6
Subversive subjects: rule-breaking and deception in clinical trials.颠覆性受试者:临床试验中的违规与欺骗行为
J Law Med Ethics. 2013 Winter;41(4):829-40, Table of Contents. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12093.
7
Developing longitudinal qualitative designs: lessons learned and recommendations for health services research.发展纵向定性设计:健康服务研究的经验教训和建议。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Feb 6;13:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-14.
8
Challenging assumptions about minority participation in US clinical research.挑战关于少数族裔参与美国临床研究的假设。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101(12):2217-22. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300279. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
9
Expanding the notion of researcher distress: the cumulative effects of coding.扩展研究者困扰的概念:编码的累积效应。
Qual Health Res. 2011 Jun;21(6):830-8. doi: 10.1177/1049732311402095. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
10
Guinea-pigging: healthy human subjects for drug safety trials are in demand. But is it a living?人体试验:药物安全试验需要健康的人类受试者。但这算一种职业吗?
New Yorker. 2008 Jan 7:36-41.