Loupatatzis Christos, Schindera Sebastian, Gralla Jan, Hoppe Hanno, Bittner Jan, Schröder Ralph, Srivastav Sudesh, Bonel Harald Marcel
Institute for Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital Berne, Freiburgstrasse 10, CH-3010 Berne, Switzerland.
Eur Radiol. 2008 Jun;18(6):1206-14. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-0875-3. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
To evaluate a triphasic injection protocol for whole-body multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with multiple trauma. Fifty consecutive patients (41 men) were examined. Contrast medium (300 mg/mL iodine) was injected starting with 70 mL at 3 mL/s, followed by 0.1 mL/s for 8 s, and by another bolus of 75 mL at 4 mL/s. CT data acquisition started 50 s after the beginning of the first injection. Two experienced, blinded readers independently measured the density in all major arteries, veins, and parenchymatous organs. Image quality was assessed using a five-point ordinal rating scale and compared to standard injection protocols [n = 25 each for late arterial chest, portovenous abdomen, and MDCT angiography (CTA)]. With the exception of the infrarenal inferior caval vein, all blood vessels were depicted with diagnostic image quality using the multiple-trauma protocol. Arterial luminal density was slightly but significantly smaller compared to CTA (P < 0.01). Veins and parenchymatous organs were opacified significantly better compared to all other protocols (P < 0.01). Arm artifacts reduced the density of spleen and liver parenchyma significantly (P < 0.01). Similarly high image quality is achieved for arteries using the multiple-trauma protocol compared to CTA, and parenchymatous organs are depicted with better image quality compared to specialized protocols. Arm artifacts should be avoided.
评估多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)全身三相注射方案在多发伤患者中的应用。对连续50例患者(41例男性)进行了检查。注射造影剂(碘浓度300mg/mL),先以3mL/s的速度注射70mL,然后以0.1mL/s的速度注射8s,再以4mL/s的速度注射另一大剂量75mL。在第一次注射开始后50s开始CT数据采集。两名经验丰富的、不知情的阅片者独立测量所有主要动脉、静脉和实质器官的密度。使用五点有序评分量表评估图像质量,并与标准注射方案进行比较(晚期动脉期胸部、门静脉期腹部和MDCT血管造影(CTA)各25例)。除肾下腔静脉外,使用多发伤方案所有血管均能以诊断性图像质量显示。与CTA相比,动脉管腔密度略低但有显著差异(P<0.01)。与所有其他方案相比,静脉和实质器官的显影明显更好(P<0.01)。手臂伪影显著降低了脾脏和肝脏实质的密度(P<0.01)。与CTA相比,使用多发伤方案对动脉可获得同样高的图像质量,与专门方案相比,对实质器官的显示图像质量更好。应避免手臂伪影。