• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助直肠癌肿瘤特异性直肠系膜切除术:一项初步随机试验的短期结果

Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial.

作者信息

Baik S H, Ko Y T, Kang C M, Lee W J, Kim N K, Sohn S K, Chi H S, Cho C H

机构信息

Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2008 Jul;22(7):1601-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9752-z. Epub 2008 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-008-9752-z
PMID:18270772
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic colorectal resection has become popular. The recently developed da Vinci Surgical System promises to facilitate endoscopic surgery and overcome its disadvantages. This study therefore aimed to compare the short-term results between robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision (R-TSME) using the da Vinci Surgical System and conventional laparoscopic tumor-specific mesorectal excision (L-TSME) in rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

Between April 2006 and February 2007, 36 patients were randomly assigned to receive R-TSME or L-TSME. During the study, 18 patients underwent robotic low anterior resection using the da Vinci Surgical System, and 18 patients had conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection. Patient characteristics, perioperative clinical results, complications, and pathologic details were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The patient characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean operating time, hemoglobin change, and conversion rate were not significantly different between the groups. Complications were treated conservatively and did not require surgical intervention in the R-TSME group. The average length of stay was 6.9 +/- 1.3 days in the R-TSME group and 8.7 +/- 1.3 days in the L-TSME group (p < 0.001). The specimen quality of the R-TSME group was acceptable.

CONCLUSION

Tumor-specific mesorectal excision was performed safely and effectively using the da Vinci Surgical System and the perioperative outcomes were acceptable.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术已变得流行。最近研发的达芬奇手术系统有望促进内镜手术并克服其缺点。因此,本研究旨在比较使用达芬奇手术系统的机器人肿瘤特异性直肠系膜切除术(R-TSME)与传统腹腔镜肿瘤特异性直肠系膜切除术(L-TSME)在直肠癌患者中的短期结果。

方法

2006年4月至2007年2月期间,36例患者被随机分配接受R-TSME或L-TSME。研究期间,18例患者使用达芬奇手术系统进行机器人低位前切除术,18例患者进行传统腹腔镜低位前切除术。比较两组患者的特征、围手术期临床结果、并发症及病理细节。

结果

两组患者特征无显著差异。两组的平均手术时间、血红蛋白变化及中转率无显著差异。R-TSME组并发症经保守治疗,无需手术干预。R-TSME组平均住院时间为6.9±1.3天,L-TSME组为8.7±1.3天(p<0.001)。R-TSME组标本质量可接受。

结论

使用达芬奇手术系统进行肿瘤特异性直肠系膜切除术安全有效,围手术期结果可接受。

相似文献

1
Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial.机器人辅助直肠癌肿瘤特异性直肠系膜切除术:一项初步随机试验的短期结果
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jul;22(7):1601-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9752-z. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
2
Comparison of the short-term efficacy of two types of robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.两种类型的机器人全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的短期疗效比较。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Jan;26(1):19-28. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02546-0. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
3
Surgical technique for mesorectal division during robot-assisted laparoscopic tumor-specific mesorectal excision (TSME) for rectal cancer using da Vinci Si surgical system: the simple switching technique (SST).达芬奇 Si 手术系统机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠癌肿瘤特异性直肠系膜全切除术(TSME)中直肠系膜分离的手术技术:简单切换技术(SST)。
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1093-1102. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00901-8. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
4
Short-term outcomes of robotic tumor-specific mesorectal resection of rectal cancer: surgical techniques in mesorectal division using rolling division of the mesorectum.机器人直肠癌特定系膜直肠系膜切除术的短期结果:使用直肠系膜滚动分离的系膜分离中的手术技术。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jun;38(6):3478-3485. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10878-9. Epub 2024 May 20.
5
Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.中低位直肠癌的全直肠系膜切除术:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 7;22(13):3602-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3602.
6
A new application of the four-arm standard da Vinci® surgical system: totally robotic-assisted left-sided colon or rectal resection.四臂标准达芬奇®手术系统的新应用:全机器人辅助左半结肠或直肠切除术。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jun;25(6):1945-52. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1492-1. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
7
Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下直肠癌低位前切除术:一项前瞻性比较研究的短期结果
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun;16(6):1480-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0435-3. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
8
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: Evaluation of the Learning Curve and Comparison of Short-term Results With Standard Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌:学习曲线评估及与标准腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术的短期疗效比较
Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Apr 1;64(4):380-388. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001816.
9
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective pilot study.机器人辅助腹腔镜经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌:一项前瞻性初步研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jan;58(1):145-53. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000265.
10
The feasibility of laparoscopic TSME preserving the left colic artery and superior rectal artery for upper rectal cancer.保留左结肠动脉和直肠上动脉的腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗上段直肠癌的可行性
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug 18;18(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01986-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic-assisted surgery for acute abdominal emergencies: a systematic review of 1142 cases.机器人辅助手术治疗急性腹部急症:1142例病例的系统评价
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 5;19(1):558. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02657-y.
2
Current Evidence in Robotic Colorectal Surgery.机器人结直肠手术的当前证据
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 29;17(15):2503. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152503.
3
Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery During the Early Learning Curve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.早期学习曲线阶段机器人辅助与腹腔镜结直肠手术的临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

本文引用的文献

1
Oncologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative resection with tumor-specific mesorectal excision for fixed locally advanced rectal cancer: Impact of postirradiated pathologic downstaging on local recurrence and survival.新辅助放化疗后行肿瘤特异性直肠系膜切除术根治性切除固定性局部晚期直肠癌的肿瘤学结局:放疗后病理降期对局部复发和生存的影响。
Ann Surg. 2006 Dec;244(6):1024-30. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225360.99257.73.
2
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术加全直肠系膜切除术
Surg Endosc. 2006 Oct;20(10):1521-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0855-5. Epub 2006 Aug 1.
3
Cureus. 2025 Jun 17;17(6):e86196. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86196. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Left colectomy for diverticular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing robotic and laparoscopic resections.针对憩室病的左半结肠切除术:比较机器人手术与腹腔镜手术切除的系统评价和荟萃分析
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 May 25;29(1):121. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03155-x.
5
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌:随机对照试验的最新系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Surg. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02805-z.
6
Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜辅助手术治疗直肠癌患者的结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Sep 3;409(1):269. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03460-3.
7
Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted comparative laparoscopic surgery in lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.机器人辅助对比腹腔镜手术在直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术中的疗效和安全性的荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5584-5595. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11111-3. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
8
Robotic laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: A propensity score matching cohort study and meta-analysis.机器人腹腔镜腹会阴联合直肠癌切除术:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究与荟萃分析。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 May 27;16(5):1280-1290. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1280.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised controlled trials.机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠疾病:随机对照试验的系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Nov;106(8):658-671. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0038. Epub 2024 May 24.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes comparing the efficacy of robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese patients.一项系统评价和荟萃分析比较了肥胖患者机器人与腹腔镜结直肠手术短期疗效的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 9;18(1):167. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01934-6.
Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of thirty-month follow-up outcomes in 312 patients.
腹腔镜直肠癌切除术:312例患者30个月随访结果的前瞻性分析
Surg Endosc. 2006 Aug;20(8):1197-202. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0599-2. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
4
Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery (HALS) at a community hospital: a prospective analysis of 104 consecutive cases.社区医院的手辅助腹腔镜结直肠手术(HALS):104例连续病例的前瞻性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2006 Jul;20(7):1077-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-2002-3. Epub 2006 May 26.
5
Computer-assisted laparoscopic colon resection with the Da Vinci system: our first experiences.使用达芬奇系统进行计算机辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术:我们的首次经验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Sep;48(9):1820-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0121-x.
6
Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗结肠癌:一项随机试验的短期结果
Lancet Oncol. 2005 Jul;6(7):477-84. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70221-7.
7
Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.结直肠癌患者传统手术与腹腔镜辅助手术的短期终点(MRC CLASICC试验):多中心随机对照试验
Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1718-26. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2.
8
Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠疾病
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Dec;47(12):2162-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0711-z.
9
Does telerobotic assistance improve laparoscopic colorectal surgery?远程机器人辅助能否改善腹腔镜结直肠手术?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005 May;20(3):253-7. doi: 10.1007/s00384-004-0671-8. Epub 2004 Dec 22.
10
Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的优势与局限:初步经验
Surg Endosc. 2005 Jan;19(1):117-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-9004-9. Epub 2004 Nov 18.