Van Noort R, Cardew G E, Howard I C, Noroozi S
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, United Kingdom.
J Dent Res. 1991 May;70(5):889-93. doi: 10.1177/00220345910700050501.
The local detail of the geometry of the adhesive interface can have a significant effect on the measurement of dentin bond strengths and may be a contributory factor in the discrepancies among data in the published literature. The potential effect on the dentin bond strength due to modifications of the local stress distribution at the adhesive/dentin interface has been assessed. Tensile bond strength measurements for specimens with and without an adhesive flash were carried out and compared with the stress distribution at the adhesive interface determined by finite element stress analysis. The results showed that when the adhesive was constrained to the interface only, the tensile bond strength was 3.10 MPa, which increased to 6.90 MPa when a flash of adhesive was present. For a realistic measurement of dentin bond strength, the adhesive should be constrained to the interface only. Extension of the adhesive beyond the interface will result in an artificially high value for the dentin bond strength. A standardized method for the measurement of dentin bond strength is urgently needed, but must take these as well as all other known factors into account if results from different testing centers are to be directly comparable.
粘结界面几何结构的局部细节对牙本质粘结强度的测量可能会产生重大影响,并且可能是导致已发表文献中数据存在差异的一个因素。已评估了由于粘结剂/牙本质界面处局部应力分布的改变对牙本质粘结强度的潜在影响。对有和没有粘结剂飞边的样本进行了拉伸粘结强度测量,并与通过有限元应力分析确定的粘结界面处的应力分布进行了比较。结果表明,当粘结剂仅被限制在界面处时,拉伸粘结强度为3.10MPa,当存在粘结剂飞边时,该强度增加到6.90MPa。为了真实地测量牙本质粘结强度,粘结剂应仅被限制在界面处。粘结剂超出界面的延伸将导致牙本质粘结强度值人为地偏高。迫切需要一种标准化的牙本质粘结强度测量方法,但如果要使不同测试中心的结果具有直接可比性,则必须考虑这些因素以及所有其他已知因素。