Sandoval Carolyn, Walter Stephen D, Krueger Paul, Loeb Mark B
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2008 Feb 13;8:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-59.
There is little consensus about how the influenza season should be defined in studies that assess influenza-attributable risk. The objective of this study was to compare estimates of influenza-associated risk in a defined clinical population using four different methods of defining the influenza season.
Using the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) clinical database and national influenza surveillance data from 1986-87 to 1990-91, four definitions were used to assess influenza-associated risk: (a) three-week moving average of positive influenza isolates is at least 5%, (b) three-week moving average of positive influenza isolates is at least 10%, (c) first and last positive influenza isolate are identified, and (d) 5% of total number of positive isolates for the season are obtained. The clinical data were from adults aged 21 to 80 with physician-diagnosed congestive heart failure. All-cause hospitalization and all-cause mortality during the influenza seasons and non-influenza seasons were compared using four definitions of the influenza season. Incidence analyses and Cox regression were used to assess the effect of exposure to influenza season on all-cause hospitalization and death using all four definitions.
There was a higher risk of hospitalization associated with the influenza season, regardless of how the start and stop of the influenza season was defined. The adjusted risk of hospitalization was 8 to 10 percent higher during the influenza season compared to the non-influenza season when the different definitions were used. However, exposure to influenza was not consistently associated with higher risk of death when all definitions were used. When the 5% moving average and first/last positive isolate definitions were used, exposure to influenza was associated with a higher risk of death compared to non-exposure in this clinical population (adjusted hazard ratios [HR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.29 and adjusted HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.33, respectively).
Estimates of influenza-attributable risk may vary depending on how influenza season is defined and the outcome being assessed.
在评估流感归因风险的研究中,关于如何定义流感季节几乎没有共识。本研究的目的是使用四种不同的定义流感季节的方法,比较在特定临床人群中流感相关风险的估计值。
利用左心室功能障碍研究(SOLVD)临床数据库以及1986 - 87年至1990 - 91年的国家流感监测数据,采用四种定义来评估流感相关风险:(a)流感阳性分离株的三周移动平均值至少为5%,(b)流感阳性分离株的三周移动平均值至少为10%,(c)确定首个和最后一个流感阳性分离株,(d)获得该季节阳性分离株总数的5%。临床数据来自年龄在21至80岁、经医生诊断为充血性心力衰竭的成年人。使用流感季节的四种定义比较流感季节和非流感季节期间的全因住院率和全因死亡率。采用发病率分析和Cox回归,使用所有四种定义评估暴露于流感季节对全因住院和死亡的影响。
无论如何定义流感季节的开始和结束,与流感季节相关的住院风险都更高。使用不同定义时,流感季节期间调整后的住院风险比非流感季节高8%至10%。然而,当使用所有定义时,暴露于流感与更高的死亡风险并非始终相关。当使用5%移动平均值和首个/最后一个阳性分离株定义时,在该临床人群中,与未暴露相比,暴露于流感与更高的死亡风险相关(调整后的风险比[HR]分别为1.16;95%置信区间[CI]为1.04至1.29和调整后的HR为1.19;95%CI为1.06至1.33)。
流感归因风险的估计值可能因流感季节的定义方式以及所评估的结局而异。