Kaelin Mark A, Huebner Wendy W, Nicolich Mark J, Kimbrough Maudellyn L
Associate Professor, Department of Health and Nutrition Sciences, College of Education and Human Services, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043; E-mail:
Am J Health Educ. 2007 Feb;38(1):16-31. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2007.10598938.
The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of a middle school epidemiology curriculum called Detectives in the Classroom. The curriculum presents epidemiology as the science of public health, using health-related issues that capture the interest of young students and help prepare them to make evidence-based health-related decisions. The curriculum was field tested among seventh-grade urban students using a quasi-experimental design. Analysis of covariance of pre- and post-test scores examined five outcomes, including students' perceptions of their abilities in science as inquiry, scientific literacy, and knowledge about five enduring epidemiologic understandings; their self reported interest in science, and assessment of students' epidemiological reasoning ability. The 378 experimental students, compared to 620 controls, had generally higher post-test improvements in epidemiology-related outcomes and smaller increases in the other measures. A dose-response was suggested by higher scores among students exposed to more than 10 lessons. Strengths of this evaluation include a large sample and availability of data to account for differences in demographic and school performance variables. Limitations of this evaluation include randomization by school as opposed to student, the relatively short-term and generally self-reported outcomes, and inconsistencies in proportion of the curriculum actually taught. The findings offer encouragement about the potential for Detectives in the Classroom to improve students' perceptions of their science abilities and scientific literacy, their interest in science and their abilities in basic epidemiologic reasoning. Further tests of this and other epidemiology curricula are needed to respond to the growing interest in teaching public health science to younger students. And while it is important to test near-term impacts, an additional challenge from a curriculum evaluation standpoint will be to follow students over several years to examine subsequent choices concerning selected courses, college majors, and career paths.
本研究的目的是测试一门名为“课堂侦探”的中学流行病学课程的有效性。该课程将流行病学呈现为公共卫生科学,利用与健康相关的问题来吸引年轻学生的兴趣,并帮助他们做好基于证据做出与健康相关决策的准备。该课程采用准实验设计在城市七年级学生中进行了实地测试。对前后测成绩的协方差分析考察了五个结果,包括学生对自己作为探究者的科学能力、科学素养以及对五种持久的流行病学理解的知识的认知;他们自我报告的对科学的兴趣,以及对学生流行病学推理能力的评估。与620名对照组学生相比,378名实验学生在与流行病学相关的结果上后测的进步普遍更大,而在其他指标上的增长较小。接触超过10节课的学生得分更高,表明存在剂量反应关系。本次评估的优点包括样本量大以及有数据可用于解释人口统计学和学校表现变量的差异。本次评估的局限性包括按学校而非学生进行随机分组、相对短期且普遍为自我报告的结果,以及实际授课的课程比例不一致。研究结果为“课堂侦探”课程在提高学生对其科学能力和科学素养的认知、对科学的兴趣以及基本流行病学推理能力方面的潜力提供了鼓舞。需要对这一课程以及其他流行病学课程进行进一步测试,以回应在向更年轻学生教授公共卫生科学方面日益增长的兴趣。虽然测试近期影响很重要,但从课程评估的角度来看,另一个挑战将是对学生进行数年跟踪,以考察他们随后在所选课程、大学专业和职业道路方面的选择。