Suppr超能文献

围产期死亡中的可避免风险因素:南澳大利亚的一项围产期审计

Avoidable risk factors in perinatal deaths: a perinatal audit in South Australia.

作者信息

De Lange Titia E, Budde Marenne P, Heard Adrian R, Tucker Graeme, Kennare Robyn, Dekker Gus A

机构信息

Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Feb;48(1):50-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00801.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyse risk factors of perinatal death, with an emphasis on potentially avoidable risk factors, and differences in the frequency of suboptimal care factors between maternity units with different levels of care.

METHODS

Six hundred and eight pregnancies (2001-2005) in South Australia resulting in perinatal death were described and compared to 86 623 live birth pregnancies.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy cases (44.4%) were found to have one or more avoidable maternal risk factors, 31 cases (5.1%) had a risk factor relating access to care, while 68 cases (11.2%) were associated with deficiencies in professional care. One hundred and four women (17.1% of cases) presented too late for timely medical care: 85% of these did have a sufficient number of antenatal visits. The following independent maternal risk factors for perinatal death were found: assisted reproductive technology (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.16), preterm labour (AOR 22.05), antepartum haemorrhage (APH) abruption (AOR 6.40), APH other/unknown cause (AOR 2.19), intrauterine growth restriction (AOR 3.94), cervical incompetence (AOR 8.89), threatened miscarriage (AOR 1.89), pre-existing hypertension (AOR 1.72), psychiatric disorder (AOR 1.85) and minimal antenatal care (AOR 2.89). The most commonly found professional care deficiency in cases was the failure to act on or recognise high-risk pregnancies/complications, found in 49 cases (8.1%).

CONCLUSION

Further improvements in perinatal mortality may be achieved by greater emphasis on the importance of antenatal care and educating women to recognise signs and symptoms that require professional assessment. Education of maternity care providers may benefit from a further focus on how to recognise and/or manage high-risk pregnancies.

摘要

目的

分析围产期死亡的风险因素,重点关注潜在可避免的风险因素,以及不同护理水平的产科单位在次优护理因素频率上的差异。

方法

描述了南澳大利亚州2001 - 2005年导致围产期死亡的608例妊娠情况,并与86623例活产妊娠进行比较。

结果

发现270例(44.4%)存在一个或多个可避免的孕产妇风险因素,31例(5.1%)有与获得护理相关的风险因素,而68例(11.2%)与专业护理缺陷有关。104名妇女(占病例的17.1%)就诊过晚,无法获得及时医疗护理:其中85%的妇女产前检查次数充足。发现以下围产期死亡的独立孕产妇风险因素:辅助生殖技术(调整比值比(AOR)3.16)、早产(AOR 22.05)、产前出血(APH)胎盘早剥(AOR 6.40)、APH其他/原因不明(AOR 2.19)、胎儿生长受限(AOR 3.94)、宫颈机能不全(AOR 8.89)、先兆流产(AOR 1.89)、既往高血压(AOR 1.72)、精神障碍(AOR 1.85)和产前检查最少(AOR 2.89)。病例中最常见的专业护理缺陷是对高危妊娠/并发症未采取行动或未识别,49例(8.1%)。

结论

通过更加强调产前护理的重要性以及教育妇女识别需要专业评估的体征和症状,围产期死亡率可能会进一步降低。对产科护理提供者的教育可能会因进一步关注如何识别和/或管理高危妊娠而受益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验