Andersen M L, Antunes I B, Silva A, Alvarenga T A F, Baracat E C, Tufik S
Department of Psychobiology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina (UNIFESP/EPM), R. Napoleão de Barros, 925, Vila Clementino 04024-002, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008 May 15;32(4):975-83. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.01.007. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
This study was designed to examine the influence of gender on sleep rebound architecture after a 4-day paradoxical sleep deprivation period. After a 5-day baseline sleep recording, both male and female rats in different phases of the estrus cycle were submitted to paradoxical sleep deprivation for 96 h. After this period, the sleep rebound recording was evaluated for 5 days (one estrus cycle). The findings revealed that after paradoxical sleep deprivation, sleep efficiency and paradoxical sleep returned to baseline values on the second day of the light period, for all except the proestrus group. During the dark rebound period, only the female groups presented increased sleep efficiency on the first day. Paradoxical sleep returned to baseline values on the third day, except for males and the cycling females submitted to paradoxical sleep deprivation in the diestrus phase, whose baseline values returned to normal on the second day of rebound period. Thus, the females and males displayed distinct patterns as a result of sleep disruption.
本研究旨在探讨性别对4天异相睡眠剥夺期后睡眠反弹结构的影响。在进行5天的基线睡眠记录后,处于发情周期不同阶段的雄性和雌性大鼠均接受96小时的异相睡眠剥夺。在此期间过后,对睡眠反弹记录进行5天(一个发情周期)的评估。研究结果显示,在异相睡眠剥夺后,除发情前期组外,所有组的睡眠效率和异相睡眠在光照期第二天恢复到基线值。在黑暗反弹期,只有雌性组在第一天睡眠效率增加。异相睡眠在第三天恢复到基线值,但处于动情后期接受异相睡眠剥夺的雄性和处于发情周期的雌性除外,它们的基线值在反弹期第二天恢复正常。因此,由于睡眠中断,雌性和雄性表现出不同的模式。