Pearson Adam M, Blood Emily A, Frymoyer John W, Herkowitz Harry, Abdu William A, Woodward Randy, Longley Michael, Emery Sanford E, Lurie Jon D, Tosteson Tor D, Weinstein James N
Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 15;33(4):428-35. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816469de.
Diskectomy candidates with at least 6 weeks of sciatica and confirmatory imaging were enrolled in a randomized or observational cohort.
This study sought to determine: (1) whether diskectomy resulted in greater improvement in back pain than nonoperative treatment, and (2) whether herniation location and morphology affected back pain outcomes.
Previous studies have reported that lumbar diskectomy is less successful for relief of back pain than leg pain and patients with central disc herniations or protrusions have worse outcomes.
Patients underwent diskectomy or received "usual" nonoperative care. Data from the randomized cohort and observational cohort were combined in an as-treated analysis. Low back pain was recorded on a 0 to 6 point scale, and changes in low back pain were compared between the surgical and nonoperative treatment groups. The effects of herniation location and morphology on back pain outcomes were determined.
The combined analysis included 1191 patients with 775 undergoing surgery within 2 years, whereas 416 remained nonoperative. Overall, leg pain improved more than back pain in both treatment groups. Back pain improved in both surgical and nonoperative patients, but surgical patients improved significantly more (treatment effect favoring surgery -0.9 at 3 months, -0.5 at 2 years, P < 0.001). Patients who underwent surgery were more likely to report no back pain than nonoperative patients at each follow-up period (28.0% vs. 12.0% at 3 months, P < 0.001, 25.5% vs. 17.6% at 2 years, P = 0.009). At baseline, central herniations were associated with more severe back pain than more lateral herniations (4.3 vs. 3.9, P = 0.012). Patients with central herniations and protrusionshad a beneficial treatment effect from surgery similar to the overall surgical group.
Diskectomy resulted in greater improvement in back pain than nonoperative treatment, and this difference was maintained at 2 years for all herniation locations and morphologies.
将患有至少6周坐骨神经痛且影像学检查确诊的椎间盘切除术候选患者纳入随机或观察性队列。
本研究旨在确定:(1)椎间盘切除术是否比非手术治疗能更有效地改善背痛;(2)椎间盘突出的位置和形态是否会影响背痛的治疗效果。
既往研究报道,腰椎间盘切除术在缓解背痛方面不如缓解腿痛成功,且中央型椎间盘突出或脱出的患者预后较差。
患者接受椎间盘切除术或接受“常规”非手术治疗。将随机队列和观察性队列的数据进行综合分析。采用0至6分的量表记录下腰痛情况,并比较手术治疗组和非手术治疗组下腰痛的变化。确定椎间盘突出的位置和形态对背痛治疗效果的影响。
综合分析纳入了1191例患者,其中775例在2年内接受了手术,416例仍未接受手术。总体而言,两个治疗组的腿痛改善均超过背痛。手术患者和非手术患者的背痛均有改善,但手术患者的改善更为显著(3个月时手术治疗效果优势为-0.9,2年时为-0.5,P<0.001)。在每个随访期,接受手术的患者比未接受手术的患者更有可能报告无背痛(3个月时分别为28.0%和12.0%,P<0.001;2年时分别为25.5%和17.6%,P=0.009)。基线时,中央型椎间盘突出比外侧型椎间盘突出与更严重的背痛相关(4.3对3.9,P=0.012)。中央型椎间盘突出和脱出的患者从手术中获得的治疗效果与整个手术组相似。
椎间盘切除术比非手术治疗能更有效地改善背痛,且对于所有椎间盘突出位置和形态,这种差异在2年内均持续存在。