• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人群管理、基于系统的实践和计划性慢性病护理:将疾病管理能力整合到初级保健中以改善综合糖尿病质量指标。

Population management, systems-based practice, and planned chronic illness care: integrating disease management competencies into primary care to improve composite diabetes quality measures.

作者信息

Kimura Joe, DaSilva Karen, Marshall Richard

机构信息

Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates and Atrius Health, Newton, Massachusetts 02466, USA.

出版信息

Dis Manag. 2008 Feb;11(1):13-22. doi: 10.1089/dis.2008.111718.

DOI:10.1089/dis.2008.111718
PMID:18279110
Abstract

The increasing prevalence of chronic illnesses in the United States requires a fundamental redesign of the primary care delivery system's structure and processes in order to meet the changing needs and expectations of patients. Population management, systems-based practice, and planned chronic illness care are 3 potential processes that can be integrated into primary care and are compatible with the Chronic Care Model. In 2003, Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, a multispecialty ambulatory physician group practice based in Boston, Massachusetts, began implementing all 3 processes across its primary care practices. From 2004 to 2006, the overall diabetes composite quality measures improved from 51% to 58% for screening (HgA1c x 2, low-density lipoprotein, blood pressure in 12 months) and from 13% to 17% for intermediate outcomes (HgA1c <or=7, low-density lipoprotein <or=100, systolic blood pressure <or=130). Over the same period, a secondary retrospective cohort analysis noted greater gains in composite screening and intermediate outcome measures for patients with planned visits compared to those who had no planned visits. This study illustrates how 1 delivery system integrated these disease management functions into the front lines of primary care and the positive impact of those changes on overall diabetes quality of care.

摘要

美国慢性病患病率不断上升,这就需要对初级保健服务体系的结构和流程进行根本性的重新设计,以满足患者不断变化的需求和期望。人群管理、基于系统的实践以及有计划的慢性病护理是可以整合到初级保健中并与慢性病护理模式兼容的三个潜在流程。2003年,位于马萨诸塞州波士顿的多专科门诊医师集团诊所哈佛先锋医疗协会开始在其初级保健实践中全面实施这三个流程。从2004年到2006年,糖尿病综合质量指标的总体筛查情况(糖化血红蛋白检测2次、低密度脂蛋白、12个月内血压)从51%提高到58%,中间结果(糖化血红蛋白≤7、低密度脂蛋白≤100、收缩压≤130)从13%提高到17%。同期,一项二次回顾性队列分析指出,与未进行计划就诊的患者相比,计划就诊患者的综合筛查和中间结果指标改善更为明显。本研究说明了一个医疗服务体系如何将这些疾病管理功能整合到初级保健的一线工作中,以及这些改变对糖尿病总体护理质量产生的积极影响。

相似文献

1
Population management, systems-based practice, and planned chronic illness care: integrating disease management competencies into primary care to improve composite diabetes quality measures.人群管理、基于系统的实践和计划性慢性病护理:将疾病管理能力整合到初级保健中以改善综合糖尿病质量指标。
Dis Manag. 2008 Feb;11(1):13-22. doi: 10.1089/dis.2008.111718.
2
Quality of care for chronic illness in primary care: opportunity for improvement in process and outcome measures.初级保健中慢性病的护理质量:改善过程和结果指标的机会。
Am J Manag Care. 1999 May;5(5):621-7.
3
Quality of care of Medicare patients with diabetes in a metropolitan fee-for-service primary care integrated delivery system.大都市按服务收费的初级保健综合提供系统中医疗保险糖尿病患者的护理质量。
Am J Med Qual. 2005 Nov-Dec;20(6):344-52. doi: 10.1177/1062860605280205.
4
Information system support as a critical success factor for chronic disease management: Necessary but not sufficient.信息系统支持作为慢性病管理的关键成功因素:必要但不充分。
Int J Med Inform. 2006 Dec;75(12):818-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.042. Epub 2006 Aug 17.
5
Can formal collaborative methodologies improve quality in primary health care in New Zealand? Insights from the EQUIPPED Auckland Collaborative.正式的协作方法能否提高新西兰初级卫生保健的质量?来自奥克兰EQUIPPED协作项目的见解。
J Prim Health Care. 2012 Dec 1;4(4):328-36.
6
Improving the reliability of physician performance assessment: identifying the "physician effect" on quality and creating composite measures.提高医生绩效评估的可靠性:识别医生对医疗质量的“影响”并制定综合指标。
Med Care. 2009 Apr;47(4):378-87. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818dce07.
7
System supports for chronic illness care and their relationship to clinical outcomes.慢性病护理的系统支持及其与临床结果的关系。
Top Health Inf Manage. 2001 Nov;22(2):65-72.
8
Quality outcomes management: Veterans Affairs case study.质量结果管理:退伍军人事务部案例研究。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2008 Mar;31(1):57-72. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2007.11.006.
9
Identifying organisational principles and management practices important to the quality of health care services for chronic conditions.确定对慢性病医疗服务质量至关重要的组织原则和管理实践。
Dan Med J. 2012 Feb;59(2):B4387.
10
Improving diabetes care through a multicomponent quality improvement model in a practice-based research network.通过基于实践的研究网络中的多组分质量改进模型改善糖尿病护理。
Am J Med Qual. 2007 Jan-Feb;22(1):34-41. doi: 10.1177/1062860606295206.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Panel Management to Identify Adult Patients With High-Risk Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease/Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis Fibrosis in a Primary Care Clinic: A Pilot Study.在初级保健诊所中使用面板管理识别患有高危代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病/代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎纤维化的成年患者:一项试点研究。
Perm J. 2024 Dec 16;28(4):38-47. doi: 10.7812/TPP/24.094. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
Disentangling Population Health Management Initiatives in Diabetes Care: A Scoping Review.理清糖尿病护理中的人群健康管理举措:一项范围综述
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Jan 30;24(1):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7512. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
3
Effect of an Online Weight Management Program Integrated With Population Health Management on Weight Change: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
在线体重管理项目与人群健康管理相结合对体重变化的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2020 Nov 3;324(17):1737-1746. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.18977.
4
Combined effect of hydrogen sulphide donor and losartan in experimental diabetic nephropathy in rats.硫化氢供体与氯沙坦联合对大鼠实验性糖尿病肾病的影响
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2015 Jul 28;14:63. doi: 10.1186/s40200-015-0185-7. eCollection 2015.
5
Effectiveness of chronic care models: opportunities for improving healthcare practice and health outcomes: a systematic review.慢性病照护模式的有效性:改善医疗实践与健康结局的机遇:一项系统综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 May 10;15:194. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0854-8.
6
Clinicians' panel management self-efficacy to support their patients' smoking cessation and hypertension control needs.临床医生支持患者戒烟和控制高血压需求的小组管理自我效能感。
Transl Behav Med. 2015 Mar;5(1):68-76. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0287-7.
7
Panel Management to Improve Smoking and Hypertension Outcomes by VA Primary Care Teams: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.退伍军人事务部初级保健团队通过小组管理改善吸烟与高血压治疗效果:一项整群随机对照试验
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jul;30(7):916-23. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3204-y. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
8
Developing a toolkit for panel management: improving hypertension and smoking cessation outcomes in primary care at the VA.开发小组管理工具包:改善退伍军人事务部初级保健中的高血压和戒烟效果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Nov 21;14:176. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-176.
9
Clinicians' views of an intervention to reduce racial disparities in diabetes outcomes.临床医生对减少糖尿病治疗结果种族差异干预措施的看法。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;103(9-10):968-77. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30454-5.
10
Outside the box: will information technology be a viable intervention to improve the quality of cancer care?突破常规:信息技术能否成为提高癌症护理质量的可行干预措施?
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):81-9. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq004.