Nather Aziz, Neo Shu Hui, Chionh Siok Bee, Liew Stanley C F, Sim Eileen Y, Chew Jocelyn L L
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore.
J Diabetes Complications. 2008 Mar-Apr;22(2):126-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2006.10.007.
To study the incidence and extent of peripheral sensory neuropathy in diabetic patients without diabetic foot problems (DFPs) with <5, 5-10 and >10 years duration of diabetes using three different modalities of testing: Pin-Prick Testing, 5.07 Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Testing (SWMT) and Rapid-Current Perception Threshold (R-CPT) measurements using the Neurometer.
Our study population consisted of 60 patients (120 feet) treated for diabetes mellitus in the Division of Endocrinology at the National University Hospital. No patient had any DFPs. Twenty-two, 21 and 17 patients had duration of diabetes of <5, 5-10 and >10 years, respectively. All patients were tested for sensory neuropathy using Pin-Prick Testing using a standardized protocol, SWMT and the Neurometer.
There was a significantly higher incidence of sensory neuropathy detected by both the Pin-Prick Test and the Neurometer as compared to the SWMT. Also, in all three modalities, there was a significant increase in incidence of sensory neuropathy detected in diabetics with >5 years duration of diabetes. In addition, the Pin-Prick Test showed an increase in extent of sensory neuropathy with a longer duration of diabetes.
The Pin-Prick Test was found to be a simple, cheap and useful diagnostic tool for detection of sensory neuropathy in diabetics without DFPs. In addition, it could accurately delineate the extent of neuropathy in the lower limb - additional useful information not obtainable with SWMT or Neurometer. Even for patients with <5 years duration of diabetes, the incidence of sensory neuropathy detected was considerable. The incidence of neuropathy detected continued to increase with length of duration of diabetes. Hence, we recommend screening of patients for neuropathy as soon as they are diagnosed with diabetes.
使用三种不同的测试方法:针刺测试、5.07 Semmes-Weinstein单丝测试(SWMT)以及使用神经仪进行的快速电流感觉阈值(R-CPT)测量,研究糖尿病病程小于5年、5至10年以及大于10年且无糖尿病足问题(DFP)的糖尿病患者周围感觉神经病变的发生率及病变程度。
我们的研究对象包括国立大学医院内分泌科治疗的60例糖尿病患者(120只脚)。所有患者均无糖尿病足问题。糖尿病病程小于5年、5至10年以及大于10年的患者分别有22例、21例和17例。所有患者均按照标准化方案通过针刺测试、SWMT以及神经仪进行感觉神经病变检测。
与SWMT相比,针刺测试和神经仪检测出的感觉神经病变发生率显著更高。此外,在所有这三种检测方法中,糖尿病病程大于5年的患者中检测出的感觉神经病变发生率均显著增加。另外,针刺测试显示,随着糖尿病病程延长,感觉神经病变程度加重。
针刺测试被发现是一种简单、廉价且有用的诊断工具,可用于检测无糖尿病足问题的糖尿病患者的感觉神经病变。此外,它能够准确描绘下肢神经病变的程度,这是SWMT或神经仪无法提供的额外有用信息。即使对于糖尿病病程小于5年的患者,检测出的感觉神经病变发生率也相当可观。随着糖尿病病程延长,检测出的神经病变发生率持续增加。因此,我们建议糖尿病患者一经诊断即进行神经病变筛查。