Martin-Flores Manuel, Campoy Luis, Ludders John W, Erb Hollis N, Gleed Robin D
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2008 May;35(3):220-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2007.00380.x. Epub 2008 Feb 18.
To compare acceleromyography (AMG) with visual assessment of train-of-four (TOF) for monitoring neuromuscular blockade and detecting residual muscle paralysis in horses receiving atracurium.
Prospective, controlled clinical study.
Nine adult, client-owned horses weighing 577 (436, 727) kg (median, minimum, maximum) and ASA physical status I-II, admitted for surgery.
An electrical nerve stimulator was used to stimulate the peroneal nerve with TOFs at 1 minute intervals. Before and after atracurium administration (0.15 mg kg(-1), IV), the number of twitches observed (TOF count, or TOFc) was assessed visually. When four twitches were seen (i.e., TOFc = 4) presence or absence of fade by visual assessment was recorded. Simultaneously, the response to each TOF was assessed by AMG; this measured TOFc, and twitch fade using TOF ratio (TOFR; ratio of fourth to first twitch). The anesthetist performing the visual evaluation was blinded to the AMG readings. Recovery from neuromuscular blockade was defined as the absence of fade by visual inspection or a TOFR > or =90% by AMG.
During onset of action of the drug, fade was first detected 4 (1, 8) minutes earlier by AMG (p = 0.008). Maximal blockade started at 6 (3, 17) minutes by visual assessment and 9 (3, 25) minutes by AMG (not significantly different). Only four horses achieved complete neuromuscular blockade (TOFc of zero by both methods); in those four horses AMG did not detect the start of the return of neuromuscular transmission before visual assessment. Visual assessment indicated the return of four twitches with no fade 12 (8, 42) minutes before AMG gave a TOFR of > or =90% (p = 0.004).
There was no substantial advantage for AMG in detecting the onset of atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade. However, AMG detected residual blockade when visual assessment of TOF did not. Application of AMG is likely to reduce the incidence of residual blockade.
比较加速度肌电图(AMG)与四个成串刺激(TOF)视觉评估法在监测接受阿曲库铵的马匹神经肌肉阻滞及检测残余肌肉麻痹方面的效果。
前瞻性对照临床研究。
9匹成年客户拥有的马匹,体重577(436,727)千克(中位数、最小值、最大值),美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况分级为I-II级,因手术入院。
使用电神经刺激器以1分钟的间隔对腓总神经进行TOF刺激。在给予阿曲库铵(0.15毫克/千克,静脉注射)前后,通过视觉评估观察到的抽搐次数(TOF计数,或TOFc)。当观察到4次抽搐(即TOFc = 4)时,记录视觉评估中是否存在衰减。同时,通过AMG评估对每个TOF的反应;测量TOFc,并使用TOF比率(TOFR;第四次抽搐与第一次抽搐的比率)评估抽搐衰减。进行视觉评估的麻醉师对AMG读数不知情。神经肌肉阻滞的恢复定义为通过视觉检查无衰减或通过AMG测得TOFR>或=90%。
在药物起效期间,AMG比视觉评估法早4(1,8)分钟首次检测到衰减(p = 0.008)。通过视觉评估,最大阻滞在6(3,17)分钟时开始,通过AMG则在9(,3,25)分钟时开始(无显著差异)。只有4匹马实现了完全神经肌肉阻滞(两种方法测得的TOFc均为零);在这4匹马中,AMG在视觉评估之前未检测到神经肌肉传递恢复的开始。视觉评估表明,在AMG测得TOFR>或=90%之前12(8,42)分钟,出现了4次无衰减的抽搐(p = 0.004)。
在检测阿曲库铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞的开始方面AMG没有实质性优势。然而,当TOF的视觉评估未检测到残余阻滞时,AMG能检测到。应用AMG可能会降低残余阻滞的发生率。