Horsdal H T, Johnsen S P, Søndergaard F, Rungby J
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Ole Worms Allé 1150, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark.
Diabetologia. 2008 Apr;51(4):567-74. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-0947-6. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We examined whether the type of preadmission glucose-lowering treatments explained differences in mortality rate and risk of readmission with myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure following first-time hospitalisation for MI in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
We conducted a nationwide population-based follow-up study among all Danish patients hospitalised with first-time MI from 1996 to 2004. Data on use of glucose-lowering drugs and other medications, comorbidities, socioeconomic status, laboratory findings, readmission with MI and heart failure, and death were obtained from medical databases. We computed mortality rates and rates of MI and heart failure readmission, according to type of glucose-lowering treatment and used Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis to compute hazard ratios (HRs) as estimates of relative risks.
We identified 8,494 MI patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The overall cumulative 30 day and 1 year mortality rates were 22.2 and 36.6%, respectively. Patients not receiving any glucose-lowering drugs (adjusted 30 day HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.57-1.10) and users of any combination (adjusted 30 day HR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.98-2.09) had the lowest and highest mortality rates, respectively, when compared with users of sulfonylureas. We found that glycaemic control had no impact on the risk estimates in a subanalysis including biochemical laboratory data. We found no differences in the risk of new MI and heart failure between the different glucose-lowering agents.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Type of preadmission glucose-lowering treatment in monotherapy is not associated with substantial differences in prognosis following hospitalisation with MI. However, patients treated with any combination had increased mortality rates.
目的/假设:我们研究了入院前降糖治疗类型是否能解释2型糖尿病患者首次因心肌梗死(MI)住院后死亡率以及再次发生心肌梗死(MI)和心力衰竭再入院风险的差异。
我们对1996年至2004年丹麦所有首次因MI住院的患者进行了一项基于全国人群的随访研究。从医疗数据库中获取降糖药物和其他药物的使用、合并症、社会经济状况、实验室检查结果、MI和心力衰竭再入院以及死亡的数据。我们根据降糖治疗类型计算死亡率以及MI和心力衰竭再入院率,并使用Cox比例风险回归分析计算风险比(HR)作为相对风险的估计值。
我们确定了8494例2型糖尿病MI患者。30天和1年的总体累积死亡率分别为22.2%和36.6%。与使用磺脲类药物的患者相比,未接受任何降糖药物治疗的患者(调整后30天HR:0.79,95%CI:0.57 - 1.10)和使用任何联合治疗的患者(调整后30天HR:1.43,95%CI:0.98 - 2.09)死亡率分别最低和最高。在包括生化实验室数据的亚分析中,我们发现血糖控制对风险估计没有影响。我们发现不同降糖药物之间新发MI和心力衰竭的风险没有差异。
结论/解读:入院前单药降糖治疗类型与MI住院后的预后差异无显著关联。然而,接受联合治疗的患者死亡率增加。