Griffin L, Anderson N C
Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas, 1 University Station, D3700, Bellmont 222, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Exp Brain Res. 2008 May;187(3):387-94. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1310-3. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
Low-frequency fatigue (LFF) is defined as a greater loss of force that occurs in during low versus high frequencies of stimulation. In order to determine which types of fatigue protocols are most likely to induce LFF, ten individuals participated in four different fatigue experiments which induced similar reductions in maximal force output as following: (1) 2-min intermittent high-frequency stimulation (40 Hz), (2) 4-min intermittent low-frequency stimulation (20 Hz), (3) sustained 100% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), and (4) low-force voluntary contractions (20% MVC). Short (5s) trains of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 80 Hz were used to determine the force-versus-frequency relationships before and after the fatigue tasks. LFF was higher following the low-force voluntary contractions compared to the high-force voluntary and evoked contractions. The degree of LFF during the low-force voluntary contractions was most highly correlated to the duration of the fatigue task and to a lesser extent, to the decrease in maximal force output and the force-time integrals during the fatigue task.
低频疲劳(LFF)被定义为在低频刺激与高频刺激期间出现的更大的力量损失。为了确定哪种类型的疲劳方案最有可能诱发低频疲劳,十名受试者参与了四项不同的疲劳实验,这些实验导致最大力量输出出现类似程度的降低,具体如下:(1)2分钟间歇性高频刺激(40赫兹),(2)4分钟间歇性低频刺激(20赫兹),(3)持续100%最大自主收缩(MVC),以及(4)低强度自主收缩(20%MVC)。在疲劳任务前后,使用10、20、30、40和80赫兹的短(5秒)串刺激来确定力量与频率的关系。与高强度自主收缩和诱发收缩相比,低强度自主收缩后的低频疲劳更高。低强度自主收缩期间的低频疲劳程度与疲劳任务的持续时间相关性最高,在较小程度上与疲劳任务期间最大力量输出的降低以及力量-时间积分相关。