Abbott J K, Bensch S, Gosden T P, Svensson E I
Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Mol Ecol. 2008 Mar;17(6):1597-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03641.x. Epub 2008 Feb 12.
The existence and mode of selection operating on heritable adaptive traits can be inferred by comparing population differentiation in neutral genetic variation between populations (often using F(ST) values) with the corresponding estimates for adaptive traits. Such comparisons indicate if selection acts in a diversifying way between populations, in which case differentiation in selected traits is expected to exceed differentiation in neutral markers [F(ST )(selected) > F(ST )(neutral)], or if negative frequency-dependent selection maintains genetic polymorphisms and pulls populations towards a common stable equilibrium [F(ST) (selected) < F(ST) (neutral)]. Here, we compared F(ST) values for putatively neutral data (obtained using amplified fragment length polymorphism) with estimates of differentiation in morph frequencies in the colour-polymorphic damselfly Ischnura elegans. We found that in the first year (2000), population differentiation in morph frequencies was significantly greater than differentiation in neutral loci, while in 2002 (only 2 years and 2 generations later), population differentiation in morph frequencies had decreased to a level significantly lower than differentiation in neutral loci. Genetic drift as an explanation for population differentiation in morph frequencies could thus be rejected in both years. These results indicate that the type and/or strength of selection on morph frequencies in this system can change substantially between years. We suggest that an approach to a common equilibrium morph frequency across all populations, driven by negative frequency-dependent selection, is the cause of these temporal changes. We conclude that inferences about selection obtained by comparing F(ST) values from neutral and adaptive genetic variation are most useful when spatial and temporal data are available from several populations and time points and when such information is combined with other ecological sources of data.
通过比较种群间中性遗传变异的种群分化(通常使用F(ST)值)与适应性性状的相应估计值,可以推断出作用于可遗传适应性性状的选择的存在和模式。此类比较表明选择是否以使种群分化的方式起作用,在这种情况下,预期所选性状的分化将超过中性标记的分化[F(ST)(所选)>F(ST)(中性)],或者负频率依赖选择是否维持遗传多态性并使种群趋向于共同的稳定平衡[F(ST)(所选)<F(ST)(中性)]。在这里,我们将假定为中性的数据(通过扩增片段长度多态性获得)的F(ST)值与颜色多态的豆娘艾氏琵蟌形态频率的分化估计值进行了比较。我们发现,在第一年(2000年),形态频率的种群分化显著大于中性位点的分化,而在2002年(仅2年和2代之后),形态频率的种群分化已降至显著低于中性位点分化的水平。因此,在这两年中,都可以排除遗传漂变作为形态频率种群分化的解释。这些结果表明,该系统中对形态频率的选择类型和/或强度在不同年份之间可能会发生很大变化。我们认为,由负频率依赖选择驱动的所有种群趋向共同平衡形态频率的方法是这些时间变化的原因。我们得出结论,当从几个种群和时间点获得空间和时间数据,并且此类信息与其他生态数据源相结合时,通过比较中性和适应性遗传变异的F(ST)值获得的关于选择的推断最为有用。