Kwon Yung-Keun, Cho Kwang-Hyun
Department of Bio and Brain Engineering and KI for the BioCentury, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 335 Gwahangno, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Republic of Korea.
Bioinformatics. 2008 Apr 1;24(7):987-94. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn060. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
It has been widely reported that biological networks are robust against perturbations such as mutations. On the contrary, it has also been known that biological networks are often fragile against unexpected mutations. There is a growing interest in these intriguing observations and the underlying design principle that causes such robust but fragile characteristics of biological networks. For relatively small networks, a feedback loop has been considered as an important motif for realizing the robustness. It is still, however, not clear how a number of coupled feedback loops actually affect the robustness of large complex biological networks. In particular, the relationship between fragility and feedback loops has not yet been investigated till now.
Through extensive computational experiments, we found that networks with a larger number of positive feedback loops and a smaller number of negative feedback loops are likely to be more robust against perturbations. Moreover, we found that the nodes of a robust network subject to perturbations are mostly involved with a smaller number of feedback loops compared with the other nodes not usually subject to perturbations. This topological characteristic eventually makes the robust network fragile against unexpected mutations at the nodes not previously exposed to perturbations.
已有广泛报道称生物网络对诸如突变等扰动具有鲁棒性。相反,人们也知道生物网络对意外突变往往很脆弱。对这些有趣的观察结果以及导致生物网络具有这种鲁棒但脆弱特性的潜在设计原则的兴趣与日俱增。对于相对较小的网络,反馈回路被认为是实现鲁棒性的重要基序。然而,目前尚不清楚多个耦合的反馈回路实际上如何影响大型复杂生物网络的鲁棒性。特别是,脆弱性与反馈回路之间的关系至今尚未得到研究。
通过广泛的计算实验,我们发现具有较多正反馈回路和较少负反馈回路的网络对扰动可能更具鲁棒性。此外,我们发现与通常不受扰动的其他节点相比,受扰动的鲁棒网络的节点大多涉及较少的反馈回路。这种拓扑特征最终使鲁棒网络在以前未受扰动的节点处面对意外突变时变得脆弱。