Suppr超能文献

普通人群中手臂、颈部和/或肩部不适(CANS)的患病率及特征

Prevalence and characteristics of complaints of the arm, neck, and/or shoulder (CANS) in the open population.

作者信息

Huisstede Bionka M A, Wijnhoven Hanneke A, Bierma-Zeinstra Sita M, Koes Bart W, Verhaar Jan A, Picavet Susan

机构信息

Erasmus MC, Department of General Practice, Rotterdam,The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2008 Mar-Apr;24(3):253-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318160a8b4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the prevalence of upper extremity disorders (UEDs) and neck as a total and complaints of the arm, neck and/or shoulder (CANS) not caused by acute trauma or any systemic disease as defined in the CANS model in the open population and to assess sociodemographic and health characteristics of chronic symptoms.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the DMC3-study, a Dutch questionnaire survey on musculoskeletal conditions (>25 y, n=3664). Data on four anatomic sites were assessed: neck, shoulder, elbow, and wrist. Various health characteristics were measured including the Short Form-36. Rectangle diagrams were used to illustrate cooccurrence of pain in the four anatomic sites.

RESULTS

The 12-month prevalence of CANS was 36.8%, the point prevalence was 26.4%, and 19.0% patients reported chronic CANS. Women, aged 45 to 64 years, with the lowest education level and working were the most affected. Within those with UEDs, around 25% of cases were caused by an acute trauma or by some systemic disease. Of those with chronic CANS, 58% reported use of healthcare. Healthcare users scored worse on general health, limitations in daily living, pain, and sickness absence than nonhealthcare users; >43% reported symptoms in more than 1 anatomic site.

DISCUSSION

UEDs and CANS frequently occur in the open population. Excluding acute traumas and systemic diseases reduced the prevalence of CANS and resulted in a relatively healthier population. A compound definition of CANS seems indicated because of the large overlap of affected anatomic sites.

摘要

目的

研究上肢疾病(UEDs)和颈部疾病的总体患病率,以及开放性人群中并非由急性创伤或任何系统性疾病引起的手臂、颈部和/或肩部症状(CANS),并评估慢性症状的社会人口统计学和健康特征。

方法

数据来自DMC3研究,这是一项关于肌肉骨骼疾病的荷兰问卷调查(年龄>25岁,n = 3664)。评估了四个解剖部位的数据:颈部、肩部、肘部和腕部。测量了各种健康特征,包括简短健康调查问卷(Short Form-36)。使用矩形图来说明四个解剖部位疼痛的同时出现情况。

结果

CANS的12个月患病率为36.8%,点患病率为26.4%,19.0%的患者报告有慢性CANS。年龄在45至64岁、教育水平最低且在职的女性受影响最大。在患有上肢疾病的患者中,约25%的病例是由急性创伤或某些系统性疾病引起的。在患有慢性CANS的患者中,58%报告使用过医疗服务。使用医疗服务的患者在总体健康、日常生活受限、疼痛和病假方面的得分比未使用医疗服务的患者差;超过43%的患者报告在不止一个解剖部位出现症状。

讨论

上肢疾病和CANS在开放性人群中经常出现。排除急性创伤和系统性疾病降低了CANS的患病率,并导致了相对更健康的人群。由于受影响的解剖部位有很大重叠,似乎需要对CANS进行复合定义。

相似文献

1
Prevalence and characteristics of complaints of the arm, neck, and/or shoulder (CANS) in the open population.
Clin J Pain. 2008 Mar-Apr;24(3):253-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318160a8b4.
4
Incidence of non-traumatic complaints of arm, neck and shoulder in general practice.
Man Ther. 2008 Oct;13(5):426-33. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2007.05.010. Epub 2007 Aug 2.
5
Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders is systematically higher in women than in men.
Clin J Pain. 2006 Oct;22(8):717-24. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000210912.95664.53.
7
Multidisciplinary consensus on the terminology and classification of complaints of the arm, neck and/or shoulder.
Occup Environ Med. 2007 May;64(5):313-9. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.023861. Epub 2006 Oct 16.
8
Incidence and prevalence of complaints of the neck and upper extremity in general practice.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jan;64(1):118-23. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.019349.
10
Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in the general population.
Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Aug 15;51(4):642-51. doi: 10.1002/art.20535.

引用本文的文献

4
Exploring the feasibility of a network of organizations for pain rehabilitation: What are the lessons learned?
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 15;17(9):e0273030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273030. eCollection 2022.
5
Health-related physical fitness in patients with complaints of hand, wrist, forearm and elbow: an exploratory study.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021 Oct 4;7(4):e001148. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001148. eCollection 2021.
8
Developing the Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg: a feasibility study protocol.
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 27;9(6):e025962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025962.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验