Vejsada R, Hník P, Navarrete R, Palecek J, Soukup T, Borecka U, Payne R
Institute of Physiology, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague.
Neuroscience. 1991;40(1):267-75. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90189-u.
The sciatic nerve was crushed in the right hindlimb in newborn (3-8 h old) rats. Two to four months later, electromyographic activity was recorded from both the control and reinnervated ankle extensor muscles soleus or lateral gastrocnemius and from the ankle flexor muscle tibialis anterior. Tonic postural activity was present in the extensor muscles on both sides during quiet stance. The control flexor muscles were usually silent in this situation, but the reinnervated flexors exhibited abnormal sustained activity. During locomotion, the control extensors were activated during the stance phase and their mean burst made up 61.5% of the step cycle. The control tibialis anterior muscle fired only during the swing phase, with the burst lasting 18.1% of the step cycle. In the reinnervated extensor muscles, the mean burst duration was decreased (46% of the cycle) but the basic locomotor pattern was not impaired. The reinnervated tibialis muscle, however, was activated abnormally, with one appropriate flexor burst during the swing phase and an "extensor-like" burst during the stance phase of the step. Reflex responses to stretch were weak or absent on the operated side. Histological examination showed that the reinnervated soleus and tibialis muscles were almost devoid of muscle spindles. The motor unit mean firing rates in the reinnervated soleus (22 imp/s) and lateral gastrocnemius (45 imp/s) matched those of the control muscles (25 and 42 imp/s, respectively). In contrast to the phasic, high-frequency firing (52-80 imp/s) in the control tibialis, the reinnervated tibialis motor units fired at significantly lower rates (22-56 imp/s).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在新生(3 - 8小时大)大鼠的右后肢挤压坐骨神经。两到四个月后,记录对照和重新支配的踝关节伸肌比目鱼肌或外侧腓肠肌以及踝关节屈肌胫骨前肌的肌电活动。安静站立时,双侧伸肌均存在紧张性姿势活动。在此情况下,对照屈肌通常无活动,但重新支配的屈肌表现出异常的持续活动。在运动过程中,对照伸肌在站立期被激活,其平均爆发活动占步周期的61.5%。对照胫骨前肌仅在摆动期放电,爆发持续时间占步周期的18.1%。在重新支配的伸肌中,平均爆发持续时间缩短(占周期的46%),但基本运动模式未受损害。然而,重新支配的胫骨肌被异常激活,在步的摆动期有一次适当的屈肌爆发,在站立期有一次“伸肌样”爆发。手术侧对牵张的反射反应微弱或消失。组织学检查显示,重新支配的比目鱼肌和胫骨肌几乎没有肌梭。重新支配的比目鱼肌(22次/秒)和外侧腓肠肌(45次/秒)的运动单位平均放电频率与对照肌肉(分别为25次/秒和42次/秒)相匹配。与对照胫骨肌的相位性高频放电(52 - 80次/秒)相比,重新支配的胫骨肌运动单位放电频率明显较低(22 - 56次/秒)。(摘要截断于250字)