Suppr超能文献

几种疫苗在实验条件下对高致病性H5N1禽流感病毒的保护效力。

Protective efficacy of several vaccines against highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus under experimental conditions.

作者信息

Veits Jutta, Römer-Oberdörfer Angela, Helferich Dorothee, Durban Markus, Suezer Yasemin, Sutter Gerd, Mettenleiter Thomas C

机构信息

Institute of Molecular Biology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Südufer 10, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2008 Mar 20;26(13):1688-96. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.016. Epub 2008 Feb 4.

Abstract

Although several vaccines have been developed to protect against highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5N1 'Asia' their efficiency has primarily been assessed individually. Thus, a direct comparison of their performance is still lacking. The following study was conducted to compare the protective efficacy of three commercially available inactivated vaccines based on influenza virus strains of subtypes H5N2 (vaccine A), H5N9 (vaccine B), and H5N3 (vaccine C), as well as two hemagglutinin expressing experimental vector vaccines (modified vaccinia virus Ankara-H5 and Newcastle disease virus-H5) against a lethal dose of highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus in chickens. To assess their potential as emergency vaccines, a single immunisation was performed for all vaccines, despite the recommendation of a double-vaccination schedule for commercial vaccines B and C. Overall, all vaccines induced clinical protection against challenge infection 3 weeks after immunisation. No mortality was observed in chickens immunised with vaccine A and viral shedding could not be detected. Immunisation with NDV-H5, vaccine C and MVA-H5 conferred also protection against lethal challenge. However, viral RNA was detected by real-time RT-PCR in swabs of 10%, 20% and 50% of animals, and 0%, 10% and 30% of animals, respectively, shed infectious virus. Immunisation with vaccine B was less protective since 50% of the vaccinated animals shed infectious virus after challenge and 20% of the chickens succumbed to disease. These results indicate that the NDV-H5 vectored vaccine is similarly effective as the best inactivated vaccine. Considering the advantage of live NDV which can be administered via spray or drinking water as well as the potential use of this H5 expressing vector vaccine for an easy DIVA (differentiating infected from vaccinated animals) strategy, NDV-H5 could represent an alternative for extensive vaccination against avian influenza in chickens.

摘要

尽管已经研发出几种疫苗来预防H5N1“亚洲”亚型高致病性禽流感,但它们的有效性主要是单独评估的。因此,仍然缺乏对它们性能的直接比较。进行了以下研究,以比较三种基于H5N2亚型流感病毒株的市售灭活疫苗(疫苗A)、H5N9(疫苗B)和H5N3(疫苗C),以及两种表达血凝素的实验性载体疫苗(安卡拉痘苗病毒-H5和新城疫病毒-H5)对鸡致死剂量的高致病性H5N1禽流感病毒的保护效力。为了评估它们作为紧急疫苗的潜力,对所有疫苗都进行了单次免疫,尽管商业疫苗B和C建议采用双疫苗接种方案。总体而言,所有疫苗在免疫后3周都诱导了针对攻毒感染的临床保护。用疫苗A免疫的鸡未观察到死亡,也未检测到病毒 shedding。用新城疫病毒-H5、疫苗C和痘苗病毒-H5免疫也提供了针对致死性攻毒的保护。然而,通过实时RT-PCR在分别10%、20%和50%的动物拭子中检测到病毒RNA,并且分别有0%、10%和30%的动物排出感染性病毒。用疫苗B免疫的保护作用较小,因为50%的接种动物在攻毒后排出感染性病毒,20%的鸡死于疾病。这些结果表明,新城疫病毒-H5载体疫苗与最佳灭活疫苗同样有效。考虑到活新城疫病毒可通过喷雾或饮水给药的优势以及这种表达H5的载体疫苗用于简易鉴别感染动物与免疫动物(DIVA)策略的潜在用途,新城疫病毒-H5可能代表鸡群中广泛接种禽流感疫苗的一种替代方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验