Ozer Josef, Ratner Marcia, Shaw Martin, Bailey Wendy, Schomaker Shelli
Safety Assessment, Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, PA, USA.
Toxicology. 2008 Mar 20;245(3):194-205. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2007.11.021. Epub 2007 Dec 5.
The level of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity reflects damage to hepatocytes and is considered to be a highly sensitive and fairly specific preclinical and clinical biomarker of hepatotoxicity. However, an increase in serum ALT activity level has also been associated with other organ toxicities, thus, indicating that the enzyme has specificity beyond liver in the absence of correlative histomorphologic alteration in liver. Thus, unidentified non-hepatic sources of serum ALT activity may inadvertently influence the decision of whether to continue development of a novel pharmaceutical compound. To assess the risk of false positives due to extraneous sources of serum ALT activity, additional biomarkers are sought with improved specificity for liver function compared to serum ALT activity alone. Current published biomarker candidates are reviewed herein and compared with ALT performance in preclinical and on occasion, clinical studies. An examination of the current state of hepatotoxic biomarkers indicates that serum F protein, arginase I, and glutathione-S-transferase alpha (GSTalpha) levels, all measured by ELISA, may show utility, however, antibody availability and high cost per run may present limitations to widespread applicability in preclinical safety studies. In contrast, the enzymatic markers sorbitol dehydrogenase, glutamate dehydrogenase, paraxonase, malate dehydrogenase, and purine nucleoside phosphorylase are all readily measured by photometric methods and use reagents that work across preclinical species and humans and are commercially available. The published literature suggests that these markers, once examined collectively in a large qualification study, could provide additional information relative to serum ALT and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) values. Since these biomarkers are found in the serum/plasma of treated humans and rats, they have potential to be utilized as bridging markers to monitor acute drug-induced liver injury in early clinical trials.
血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)活性水平反映肝细胞损伤,被认为是肝毒性的一种高度敏感且相当特异的临床前和临床生物标志物。然而,血清ALT活性水平升高也与其他器官毒性有关,因此,在肝脏无相关组织形态学改变的情况下,表明该酶具有肝脏以外的特异性。因此,血清ALT活性的不明非肝脏来源可能会无意中影响是否继续开发新型药物化合物的决策。为了评估由于血清ALT活性的外部来源导致假阳性的风险,人们正在寻找与单独的血清ALT活性相比对肝功能具有更高特异性的其他生物标志物。本文对当前已发表的生物标志物候选物进行了综述,并与临床前及有时在临床研究中的ALT表现进行了比较。对肝毒性生物标志物的当前状态进行检查表明,通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)测量的血清F蛋白、精氨酸酶I和谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶α(GSTα)水平可能具有实用性,然而,抗体的可用性和每次检测的高成本可能会限制其在临床前安全性研究中的广泛应用。相比之下,酶标志物山梨醇脱氢酶、谷氨酸脱氢酶、对氧磷酶、苹果酸脱氢酶和嘌呤核苷磷酸化酶都可以通过光度法轻松测量,并且所使用的试剂适用于临床前物种和人类,并且可以从商业渠道获得。已发表的文献表明,这些标志物一旦在大型鉴定研究中进行综合检查,可能会提供与血清ALT和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)值相关的额外信息。由于这些生物标志物存在于接受治疗的人类和大鼠的血清/血浆中,它们有可能被用作桥接标志物,以监测早期临床试验中急性药物性肝损伤。