Tonetti Lorenzo, Pasquini Francesco, Fabbri Marco, Belluzzi Massimiliano, Natale Vincenzo
Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Chronobiol Int. 2008 Feb;25(1):145-53. doi: 10.1080/07420520801897228.
The present study aimed to compare two commercially available actigraphs, with a concurrent polysomnographic (PSG) recording. Twelve healthy volunteers (six women; age range 19-28 yrs) simultaneously wore the Basic Mini-Motionlogger and Actiwatch for seven overnight polysomnographic recordings. Comparisons of the following sleep measures were focused on: sleep onset latency (SOL), total sleep time, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency. Both devices underestimated SOL in comparison to PSG, but they had similar performance compared to PSG for the other sleep measures. A limit of the study is that the results can be only generalized to healthy young subjects.
本研究旨在通过同步多导睡眠图(PSG)记录,比较两款市售的活动记录仪。12名健康志愿者(6名女性;年龄范围19 - 28岁)同时佩戴基本型迷你运动记录仪和活动监测仪,进行7次夜间多导睡眠图记录。重点比较了以下睡眠指标:入睡潜伏期(SOL)、总睡眠时间、睡眠中觉醒时间和睡眠效率。与PSG相比,两款设备均低估了SOL,但在其他睡眠指标方面,它们与PSG的表现相似。本研究的一个局限性在于,结果仅能推广至健康的年轻受试者。