Suppr超能文献

健康年轻受试者中两种不同活动记录仪与多导睡眠图的比较。

Comparison of two different actigraphs with polysomnography in healthy young subjects.

作者信息

Tonetti Lorenzo, Pasquini Francesco, Fabbri Marco, Belluzzi Massimiliano, Natale Vincenzo

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Chronobiol Int. 2008 Feb;25(1):145-53. doi: 10.1080/07420520801897228.

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare two commercially available actigraphs, with a concurrent polysomnographic (PSG) recording. Twelve healthy volunteers (six women; age range 19-28 yrs) simultaneously wore the Basic Mini-Motionlogger and Actiwatch for seven overnight polysomnographic recordings. Comparisons of the following sleep measures were focused on: sleep onset latency (SOL), total sleep time, wake after sleep onset, and sleep efficiency. Both devices underestimated SOL in comparison to PSG, but they had similar performance compared to PSG for the other sleep measures. A limit of the study is that the results can be only generalized to healthy young subjects.

摘要

本研究旨在通过同步多导睡眠图(PSG)记录,比较两款市售的活动记录仪。12名健康志愿者(6名女性;年龄范围19 - 28岁)同时佩戴基本型迷你运动记录仪和活动监测仪,进行7次夜间多导睡眠图记录。重点比较了以下睡眠指标:入睡潜伏期(SOL)、总睡眠时间、睡眠中觉醒时间和睡眠效率。与PSG相比,两款设备均低估了SOL,但在其他睡眠指标方面,它们与PSG的表现相似。本研究的一个局限性在于,结果仅能推广至健康的年轻受试者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验