Suppr超能文献

无管经皮肾镜取石术:用输尿管导管替代双J支架管如何?

Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what about replacing the Double-J stent with a ureteral catheter?

作者信息

Mouracade Pascal, Spie Romain, Lang Herve, Jacqmin Didier, Saussine Christian

机构信息

Department of Urology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2008 Feb;22(2):273-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0162.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of replacing the Double-J stent with a ureteral catheter in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From August 1998 to February 2007, 33 patients underwent tubeless PCNL for renal calculi by the same surgeon. A retrograde 7F ureteral catheter was placed at the beginning of the surgery in all patients. A nephrostomy tube was not used in any patient. At the end of the procedure, the working tract was electrocauterized using a 26F resectoscope with a rollerball electrode; no hemostatic sealant was used. The ureteral catheter was the sole means of drainage left in place. The incidence and type of complications, the operative time, the length of hospitalization, the rate of transfusion, and the degree of pain were obtained by chart review.

RESULTS

In this group of patients, the mean stone burden was 17.25 mm. The mean operative time was 71.5 min. The mean length of hospitalization was 1.9 day (range 1 to 7 days). The mean hemoglobin decrease was 0.8 g/dL. No blood transfusions were needed. The mean visual analog pain intensity scale was 1.87. Complications developed in five (15%) patients, of whom one needed a Double-J stent placement. The complications were pyelonephritis, urinary extravasation, sustained hematuria, and renal colic. The ureteral catheter was removed by postoperative day 1 in 91% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Replacing the Double-J stent with a ureteral catheter in tubeless PCNL is an effective procedure and can be performed in patients with a moderate stone burden. The electrocauterization of the bleeding points at the end of percutaneous renal surgery with a rollerball resectoscope is safe.

摘要

目的

评估在无管经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中用输尿管导管替代双J支架管的可行性和安全性。

材料与方法

1998年8月至2007年2月,33例患者由同一位外科医生进行了无管PCNL治疗肾结石。所有患者在手术开始时均逆行置入一根7F输尿管导管。所有患者均未使用肾造瘘管。手术结束时,使用带有球电极的26F电切镜对工作通道进行电灼;未使用止血密封剂。输尿管导管是留置的唯一引流方式。通过查阅病历获得并发症的发生率和类型、手术时间、住院时间、输血率和疼痛程度。

结果

在这组患者中,平均结石负荷为17.25mm。平均手术时间为71.5分钟。平均住院时间为1.9天(范围1至7天)。平均血红蛋白下降0.8g/dL。无需输血。平均视觉模拟疼痛强度评分为1.87。5例(15%)患者出现并发症,其中1例需要放置双J支架管。并发症包括肾盂肾炎、尿外渗、持续性血尿和肾绞痛。91%的患者在术后第1天拔除输尿管导管。

结论

在无管PCNL中用输尿管导管替代双J支架管是一种有效的方法,可用于结石负荷中等的患者。经皮肾手术后用球电极电切镜对出血点进行电灼是安全的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验