• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾造瘘术与无管经皮肾镜取石术的随机对照试验

A randomized controlled trial of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

作者信息

Crook T J, Lockyer C R, Keoghane S R, Walmsley B H

机构信息

Solent Department of Urology, St. Mary's Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Urol. 2008 Aug;180(2):612-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.020. Epub 2008 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.020
PMID:18554657
Abstract

PURPOSE

We established whether totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy with no nephrostomy or ureteral stent is a safe management technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to have a nephrostomy placed (group 1 control) or none (group 2 treatment). A total of 25 patients were randomized to each group. Cases were considered uncomplicated and suitable for randomization if there was no significant bleeding or residual stone load, the pelvicaliceal system was intact and there was no evidence of a residual ureteral stone. The primary outcome measure was length of stay, and secondary outcomes were analgesic requirements and postoperative complications such as bleeding, infection or ureteral obstruction. Hospital readmission rates and stone clearance rates were also recorded.

RESULTS

Mean stone size was 21.6 vs 17.5 mm. There were no transfusions in either group. Hemoglobin change was 2.03 vs 1.18 gm/dl and mean creatinine increase was 0.029 vs -0.111 mg/dl. There were no differences in hemorrhage, infection and serum parameters. There were no readmissions in either group. Mean length of stay was 3.4 vs 2.3 days (p <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This trial demonstrates that percutaneous nephrolithotomy without nephrostomy or stent is a safe and well tolerated procedure in selected patients. Length of stay was reduced with no major complications in either group. We believe that totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy may be considered an accepted standard of care for selected cases and it is possible to reserve placement of a nephrostomy tube or internal ureteral stent for specific indications.

摘要

目的

我们确定了不放置肾造瘘管或输尿管支架的完全无管经皮肾镜取石术是否为一种安全的治疗技术。

材料与方法

将患者随机分为放置肾造瘘管组(第1组,对照组)或不放置肾造瘘管组(第2组,治疗组)。每组随机分配25例患者。如果没有明显出血或残余结石负荷、肾盂肾盏系统完整且没有残余输尿管结石的证据,则病例被认为是无并发症且适合随机分组。主要观察指标为住院时间,次要观察指标为镇痛需求以及术后并发症,如出血、感染或输尿管梗阻。还记录了医院再入院率和结石清除率。

结果

平均结石大小分别为21.6和17.5毫米。两组均无输血情况。血红蛋白变化分别为2.03和1.18克/分升,平均肌酐升高分别为0.029和 -0.111毫克/分升。出血、感染和血清参数方面无差异。两组均无再次入院情况。平均住院时间分别为3.4天和2.3天(p<0.05)。

结论

本试验表明,对于选定的患者,不放置肾造瘘管或支架的经皮肾镜取石术是一种安全且耐受性良好的手术。两组住院时间均缩短,且无重大并发症。我们认为,对于选定的病例,完全无管经皮肾镜取石术可被视为一种可接受的治疗标准,并且有可能针对特定指征保留肾造瘘管或输尿管内支架的放置。

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of nephrostomy placement versus tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.肾造瘘术与无管经皮肾镜取石术的随机对照试验
J Urol. 2008 Aug;180(2):612-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.020. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
2
Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy.完全无管经皮肾镜取石术
J Endourol. 2008 Feb;22(2):267-71. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0034.
3
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what about replacing the Double-J stent with a ureteral catheter?无管经皮肾镜取石术:用输尿管导管替代双J支架管如何?
J Endourol. 2008 Feb;22(2):273-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0162.
4
Comparison of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a randomized, clinical trial.完全无管经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的比较:一项随机临床试验
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016;49(4):e4878. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20154878. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
5
A Randomized Controlled Comparison of Nephrostomy Drainage vs Ureteral Stent Following Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using the Wisconsin StoneQOL.使用威斯康星州结石生活质量量表对经皮肾镜取石术后肾造瘘引流与输尿管支架置入进行的随机对照比较
J Endourol. 2016 Dec;30(12):1275-1284. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0235.
6
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: nephrostomy or tubeless or totally tubeless?经皮肾镜碎石术:肾盂造口术或无管或完全无管?
Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1043-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.104. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
7
Totally tubeless, tubeless, and tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating kidney stones.完全无管化经皮肾镜取石术、无管化经皮肾镜取石术和有管化经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD012607. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012607.pub2.
8
Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: selecting for success in children.完全无管经皮肾镜取石术:为儿童的成功选择。
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;22(4):565-70.
9
Questioning the wisdom of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal vs tubeless PCNL.质疑无管经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)的合理性:早期拔管与无管经皮肾镜碎石术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
BJU Int. 2010 Oct;106(7):1045-8; discussion 1048-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09223.x. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
10
Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy--should a stent be an integral part?无管经皮肾镜取石术——支架应成为其不可或缺的一部分吗?
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):921-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.021. Epub 2007 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Pain management in percutaneous nephrolithotomy - an approach rooted in pathophysiology.经皮肾镜取石术中的疼痛管理——一种基于病理生理学的方法。
Nat Rev Urol. 2025 Jan 13. doi: 10.1038/s41585-024-00973-w.
2
Is Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy a Safe and Efficacious Option for Complex Stone Disease?完全无管经皮肾镜取石术对于复杂性结石病是一种安全有效的选择吗?
J Clin Med. 2024 May 31;13(11):3261. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113261.
3
A Comparative Analysis between Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of >15 mm Non-Obstructing Proximal Ureteral Stones.
软性输尿管镜碎石术与无管经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径>15mm非梗阻性近端输尿管结石的对比分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 7;12(24):7541. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247541.
4
Tubeless PCNL versus standard PCNL for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones: a propensity score matching analysis.无管化经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗上尿路结石:倾向评分匹配分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Apr;56(4):1281-1288. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03872-y. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
5
Totally tubeless, tubeless, and tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating kidney stones.完全无管化经皮肾镜取石术、无管化经皮肾镜取石术和有管化经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD012607. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012607.pub2.
6
Are Nephrostomy and Ureteral Stent Necessary after Multi-Access Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy?多通道经皮肾镜取石术后肾造瘘和输尿管支架置入是否必要?
Curr Urol. 2019 Nov;13(3):141-144. doi: 10.1159/000499279. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
7
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): Standard Technique Versus Tubeless - 125 Procedures.经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL):标准技术与无管化——125例手术
Cureus. 2019 Mar 14;11(3):e4251. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4251.
8
Comparison of outcomes in totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy according to nephrostomy tract sealing with fibrin versus gelatin matrix: a propensity score matching study.比较纤维蛋白与明胶基质封闭经皮肾造瘘管在完全无管化经皮肾镜取石术中的疗效:倾向评分匹配研究。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Apr;48(2):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s00240-019-01126-0. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
9
Choosing the appropriate size of Amplatz sheath during percutaneous nephrolithotomy-a novel method.经皮肾镜取石术中选择合适尺寸的安普拉斯鞘——一种新方法。
Turk J Urol. 2018 Mar;44(2):138-141. doi: 10.5152/tud.2017.34682. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
10
Tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update meta-analysis.无管化与标准经皮肾镜取石术:一项更新的荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2017 Nov 13;17(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0295-2.